tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post1922318779671691872..comments2024-03-23T03:47:03.187-07:00Comments on Scott Wolter Answers: America Unearthed Notes on The Spearhead ConspiracyScott Wolterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comBlogger77125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-25679142461062492662021-08-18T12:27:38.741-07:002021-08-18T12:27:38.741-07:00Anonymous,
I find it interesting our show prompte...Anonymous,<br /><br />I find it interesting our show prompted an academic response at all. However, I found the argument the obsidian that proved to indeed be of Mexican origin, but dismissed as modern due to the "modern" style of the type of point carved. I find this highly subjective opinion to be totally unconvincing and frankly, a desperate attempt to dismiss any notion of legitimate evidence of Pre-Columbian contact from another continent.<br /><br />So it goes...Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-55598430888736419462021-08-17T07:50:15.356-07:002021-08-17T07:50:15.356-07:00https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102662
The ...https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102662<br /><br />The report on the spear pointAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-17625540474419887992019-09-12T09:04:24.823-07:002019-09-12T09:04:24.823-07:00Unknown/Anonymous,
You found the time to post a s...Unknown/Anonymous,<br /><br />You found the time to post a snarky response, but refuse to identify yourself. If you want your comments to be taken seriously, show some integrity and tell us who you are. If you are as credible archaeologist as you claim, you know this is a basic courtesy and provides credibility.<br /><br />You know how this works.Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-66309345773339481442019-09-12T09:01:09.759-07:002019-09-12T09:01:09.759-07:00Unknown,
Speaking of making unsupported claims......Unknown,<br /><br />Speaking of making unsupported claims... You have not identified yourself, only claim you are an archaeologist. You claim to have examined the artifact; evidence to support the claim? You list a series of items as to why the artifact is "fake." Can you site a report, supply photos, anything other than an anonymous series of claims?<br /><br />If not, then you should delete your comment. A good start would be to identify yourself.Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-18678605579977147712019-09-12T08:46:31.561-07:002019-09-12T08:46:31.561-07:00I figured out how to delete. I've never blogg...I figured out how to delete. I've never blogged, it's pretty foreign to me. You are right, I don't know what I am talking about and the green obsidian point is entirely real and absolute proof that Polynesians and Mesoamericans were in contact (Aztecs? Teotihuacanos?).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-25210436512541845222019-09-11T09:19:17.779-07:002019-09-11T09:19:17.779-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Wes Stonerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14320134566058327752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-196920856288885852017-06-05T17:40:50.236-07:002017-06-05T17:40:50.236-07:00Brettany,
Those educated people were Cistercian m...Brettany,<br /><br />Those educated people were Cistercian monks who were the brightest of the brightest.Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-36047585997332042172017-06-05T15:26:15.962-07:002017-06-05T15:26:15.962-07:00I can agree with you on thatI can agree with you on thatBrettanyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05944136672701678190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-8998138949194647502015-09-18T07:34:27.201-07:002015-09-18T07:34:27.201-07:00Paul,
I have no doubt members of the Sinclair/St....Paul,<br /><br />I have no doubt members of the Sinclair/St. Clair clan could speak/write multiple languages or had people close to them who did. These people intermarried with Norse royalty in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark so they had access to the most powerful, influential, and educated people of their time.Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-57445021369485960612015-09-17T18:35:50.611-07:002015-09-17T18:35:50.611-07:00scott my name is Paul I've been watching your...scott my name is Paul I've been watching your shows on the the Sinclair family and the knights Templars, I've been doing research on my family and my genealogy. I have found out that I have Sinclairs in my family tree. I've actually gone back about 75 generations on ancestry.com. Actually bringing up my research of the my family Tree starting with myself, and it went to, starting with Janet Sinclair descendant of Henry Sinclair. Also as I Iearned by my research not only were the Sinclairs Knights Templars but they were also Teutonic Knights and at least one went on campaign with them. They were also lords of the Orkney Islands which belonged to the King of Norway. So could the Sinclairs have spoken and written, French, English, latin as well as (Gaelic Germanic, Slavic)? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-51872772493704516562015-06-20T09:26:48.246-07:002015-06-20T09:26:48.246-07:00Mr. White,
The DNA testing found a connection to ...Mr. White,<br /><br />The DNA testing found a connection to the local Native American tribe which doesn't surprise me in the least. However, who's to say the local Natives don't have Polynesian DNA markers within them? This has been a highly charged political situation that certainly has more to the story. There's no way in the world that any Polynesian DNA connection within the Natives would be mentioned in this situation. <br /><br />I would wait until the raw DNA results are released until we draw any definitive conclusions. Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-37034780787082397302015-06-20T09:00:24.722-07:002015-06-20T09:00:24.722-07:00Scott-
Looks like DNA proves Kennewick man is Nat...Scott-<br /><br />Looks like DNA proves Kennewick man is Native American, not Polynesian. Gotta love the reconstruction that looks like Patrick Stewart, too. Now what?Mr. Whitehttp://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/19/science/new-dna-results-show-kennewick-man-was-native-american.html?_r=0noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-43378018500204698002015-02-05T12:27:57.323-08:002015-02-05T12:27:57.323-08:00Mr. Wolter,
I found an article from May of l...Mr. Wolter,<br /><br /> I found an article from May of last year describing the watershed moment for Dr. Chatters' change of mind on the ancestry of the Kennewick Man (http://www.yakimaherald.com/news/2182718-8/12000-year-old-skeleton-sheds-light-on-kennewick-man). It seems as if the skeleton in Mexico takes him off the hook (or at least gives him a way out) of his claim that Kennewick Man was probably not Native American. The first sentence in the article gave me the impression that Dr. Chatters had to go underground after he made his claim of KM's non-traditional heritage. <br /><br />It is my guess that there is much more to this story (Smithsonian, Dr. Stafford, Dr. Chatters, land and casino rights, etc.,) than what I am reading in a simple Google search. How about a follow-up episode or special on the Kennewick Man, sir?<br /><br />Respectfully,<br />Pastor MikeSpurgeonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15806042898171384243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-44853751542610520022015-02-05T12:03:17.543-08:002015-02-05T12:03:17.543-08:00Mr. Wolter,
I looked a little further into t...Mr. Wolter,<br /><br /> I looked a little further into this topic, especially Dr. Chatter's input on the issue. It so happens he was quoted in a Seattle newspaper just days ago. You may find it interesting what Dr. Chatters says in this article . . .<br /><br />http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2025488002_kennewickdnaxml.html<br /><br />Respectfully,<br />Pastor Mike Spurgeonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15806042898171384243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-66395741476654387972015-02-05T11:20:08.121-08:002015-02-05T11:20:08.121-08:00Mike,
To be honest, I don't know what to thin...Mike,<br /><br />To be honest, I don't know what to think. I don't trust academia not to put in their dogmatic spin with Kennewick Man, and the Native American's have their own agenda that has to do with land and Casino rights from what I understand. <br /><br />I'd side with the natives if I had to choose, but I honestly don't know what to do in this situation. I do trust Jim Chatters and if says the features of the skeleton are not Native American and consistent with ancient Polynesians, they I say go with that. Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-44453190472981125852015-02-05T11:07:00.887-08:002015-02-05T11:07:00.887-08:00Mr. Wolter,
The Kennewick Man has recently r...Mr. Wolter,<br /><br /> The Kennewick Man has recently resurfaced in the news as of late (pun intended.) What is your take on the DNA story that trended a few weeks ago? I find myself confused because one story lead me to believe the testing was done<br /><br /> (http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/preliminary-results-suggest-kennewick-man-was-native-american) <br /><br /> . . . while another story had me rethinking if a test had been done at all . . .<br /><br />(http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98495&page=1). Please help give me some clarity on this, sir. <br /><br />Until The Whole World Hears,<br />Pastor MikeSpurgeonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15806042898171384243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-74264412811713589392014-04-20T08:27:04.141-07:002014-04-20T08:27:04.141-07:00Troutman,
The drone idea has been brought up seve...Troutman,<br /><br />The drone idea has been brought up several times by viewers and is something we might pursue in the future if we could find the proper unit with enough range and of course, granted permission to use it! Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-29617467499020728082014-04-17T17:53:16.646-07:002014-04-17T17:53:16.646-07:00Hey Scott,
I enjoyed the Grand Canyon episode...Hey Scott,<br /> I enjoyed the Grand Canyon episode, that story has fascinated me from the time I read of it many years ago. Now that drones have become relatively common, was any thought given to popping a camera-equipped drone down over the edge to have a look for the old cave entrance?<br /> I'm assuming with the bizarre FAA laws, even if the team were to find something you wouldn't be able to air it without risking prosecution for violating airspace, but it's a tempting thought.Troutmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-55990803237573538372014-04-01T18:16:53.432-07:002014-04-01T18:16:53.432-07:00Angie,
The skeptics had is wrong because they did...Angie,<br /><br />The skeptics had is wrong because they didn't have all the facts??? It's amazing how sometimes off-the-cuff, flippant comments from people with perceived authority can do serious long-term damage that can take, in the case apparently, hundreds of years to correct.<br /><br />Thanks for sharing. Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-68687359506195317602014-04-01T14:03:40.631-07:002014-04-01T14:03:40.631-07:00Scott, well done on the Polynesia and Kennewick ep...Scott, well done on the Polynesia and Kennewick episode. One thing you have neglected however, are the political ramifications to First Nation peoples if it should be proven that contact with Europe and/or other areas of the world occured. While I agree with your comments in previous episodes that people could have arrived in North America from Europe more than 25,000 years ago, the ramifications of the last 500 years of European expansion and the destruction of First Nations peoples makes it politically incorrect to admit to that possibility. In addition, for Kennewick Man, you should be looking at why there was court case to allow examination of the remains, and what the Corp of Engineers did to the site where the remains were found. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-30796891022413993052014-03-31T20:50:15.754-07:002014-03-31T20:50:15.754-07:00Scott (& Dave),
I have been eagerly awaiting ...Scott (& Dave),<br /><br />I have been eagerly awaiting for the information to be released on the results of the DNA testing and subsequent facial reconstruction on the skull of the possible study for the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci. While reading some related articles, I came across this article from 2012: <br /><br />http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Its-all-in-the-eyesand-the-lips/25700<br /><br />This is more proof that the history we are told is wrong! In this article, it is proven that a majority (not all) of 'academics' that dismissed an Italian Art Historian for more than 500 years were wrong. They assumed his descriptions were fabricated and unreliable, but here we are, 500 years later, learning that he got it right, and the skeptics were wrong because they didn't have all of the facts! Interesting read, for sure. <br /><br />AngieAngie Dubosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04872050295093214732noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-9979168064624149342014-03-28T10:38:24.753-07:002014-03-28T10:38:24.753-07:00Dave,
The current story is wrong and it would be ...Dave,<br /><br />The current story is wrong and it would be nice if the problem academics would put aside their preconceived notions, open their minds and be part of the solution.<br />Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-90317849703847122812014-03-28T10:07:16.731-07:002014-03-28T10:07:16.731-07:00Piri Reis Map ---- if walls could talk. Does my he...Piri Reis Map ---- if walls could talk. Does my heart good, Scott, that you are going after that one, also. Simply put, it shows things that were, supposedly, unknown at that time. In other words, the current story is ----- wrong. Explorer Davenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-7316972860634907672014-03-26T18:50:19.204-07:002014-03-26T18:50:19.204-07:00Angie,
Actually, I have seen the Piri Reis Map an...Angie,<br /><br />Actually, I have seen the Piri Reis Map and you just might see it in an upcoming episode. For that reason I'll save my comments for a future post. I'm sure you understand. <br /><br />With regard to Kennewick Man, it seems the Burke Museum either doesn't want anyone to conduct DNA analysis on the remains, or they've already done it and don't want us to know the results. If they were clearly Native, wouldn't the remains have been returned for re-interment?Scott Wolterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16758613621836354475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7617813063932228103.post-63688794653893562482014-03-26T07:30:34.312-07:002014-03-26T07:30:34.312-07:00Scott,
I appreciate your response!
I couldn'...Scott,<br /><br />I appreciate your response!<br /><br />I couldn't agree more, freedom is more important, so you really summed up my point in your reference to placing academics on a witness stand! <br /><br />In reference to the Kennewick Man, it makes absolutely no sense that the museum doesn't allow access to the remains for examination and evaluation. In 2012, the University of Richmond (where I received my undergrad), in Richmond, VA allowed a student access to their 7th century BCE Egyptian mummy for evaluation and study. This access was closely supervised, and rightly so, but is a wonderful example of how new research must be the standard when it comes to ancient artifacts and history! I realize that the Kennewick Man is significantly older; however, his remains survived, almost completely intact, in the elements of nature until 1996 AD. So their argument for refusing to allow trained professionals access to the remains in a controlled laboratory environment clearly has no merit. <br /><br />Have you studied what remains of the Piri Reis Map? Given the controversial detail of this map, although post-Columbian, I wondered if there was any evidence depicted on that map to support your other evidence of pre-Columbian discovery.<br /><br />AngieAngie Dubosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04872050295093214732noreply@blogger.com