Tuesday, July 16, 2019

American Unearthed, Season 4, Episode 8, Sir Francis Drake

The Sir Francis Drake episode was especially interesting in part because I knew almost nothing about the British explorer prior to filming it.  Well I know a lot about him now and many of the details of his incredibly successful circumnavigation of the world.  It seems the world is fascinated with treasure and he certainly collected more than his share by plundering Spanish ships and villages along the west coast of  South and Central America during his famous voyage.  With his loaded ship leaking as it approached what is now San Francisco Bay, he landed somewhere on the west coast for repairs.  The big question and persistent legend is whether he buried some of the booty he plundered, to be collected later, after his return to England.  For me, this seems highly unlikely.  Why leave valuable treasure so far from your home base?  It seems it would be that last place to hide it if you truly intended to recover it later.  I'd leave it a closer to home if I had bothered at all.  I think the more important treasure is the one artifact we know he left on the west coast of North America; the brass plaque date June 17, 1579.

When we visited the Bancroft Library on the campus of Berkeley University, we had already secured permission to test the plaque using an X-Ray Florescence gun to determine the exact chemical composition of the brass, and of the secondary patina that had developed on the surface.  Presumably, the plaque was originally discovered in 1933, and then again in 1936, when it was brought to the attention of authorities who at first proclaimed it genuine.  Later, in the 1970's it was tested and became the scourge of competing institutions who believed it was a hoax perpetrated by a high society club of pranksters.  This reeks of the same rumor mill behavior that dogged the Kensington Rune Stone for a century before proper scientific inquiry definitively proved it was genuine.  We were hoping to possibly do the same type of scientific testing during our visit.  However, the permission we had been given prior to our visit was rescinded.  You can imagine how I felt about that.  Curious to hear your thoughts about the episode?     


Through the slats on the bow of Sir Francis Drake's ship, the Golden Hinde, is where the crew would take care of their 'daily duties' while on the open ocean.


Robert Stupack stands next to a 3-inch diameter hole in a boulder along the shore of San Francisco Bay where he believes Sir Francis Drake landed and tied up his ship.


The Committee Films Crew shoots the plate some believe was left by Sir Francis Drake as a land claim for England in 1579.


The front side of the brass plate date June 17, 1579, that many believe is authentic.  We may have been able to date it had we been allowed to perform that testing the library had originally given us permission to do.


Robert Stupack and I had a playful sword fight using stakes we had just disagreed on about their age and use while filming.  In the end, we agreed to disagree and all was good.


Field director, Sergio Rapu, poses next to some circular concretions weathering out of the fine sandstone at Whale Cove along the southwestern coast of Oregon. 


Archaeologist, Melissa Darby, and I pose between takes at Whale Cove where many believe Sir Francis Drake landed on the west coast before heading west back to England in 1579.


Branden Boulay shoots me examining the monument to explorers Lewis and Clark at the point where they reached the Pacific Ocean in November of 1805. 


18 comments:

  1. amazing episode Scott! Prob one of my all time favs. Them not letting you test Drakes plate seems more politically motivated to me than having to do with the treasure. A lot of people feel like that land is by right part of Mexico. This really proves otherwise. This episode rewrites history!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dan,

      Politics is very likely part of the reason for the push-back, but it could also be institutional power tripping.

      Delete
  2. Am embarrassed to say I knew very little about Sir Francis Drake and his voyage(s) prior to this episode. Once again, after watching this show, I learned something new.

    Pity the museum didn't allow you to test the composition of that brass plate. Especially after you said they initially gave you permission to do so. I mean, they have non invasive methods now that can reliably give you the metal composition information. Oh well, maybe some day they will change their mind about that.

    From the evidence shown, I think Oregon is a good possibility for the Drake landing and potential treasure site. Admittedly though, that map could resemble a lot of similar areas up and down the West Coast. But the evidence presented makes a great deal of sense. Definitely hope sometime some person does run across that treasure trove (wherever it might be).

    Cute picture of the sword fight as well. :) Excellent episode once again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe C.

      Frustrating as the situation was at the Bancroft Library, I'm encouraged that we will be able to return one day and finish the job. My gut tells me we'll get a positive result. Now we just need to do the science to back it up!

      Glad you enjoyed the episode.

      Delete
  3. Sorry they didn't allow you to test like they had agreed, but you know what that usually means....getting to close to the fire! No matter what though, you still have fun!!! Thank you for trying and just keep doin what you're doin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Part of the problem is if it turns out to be authentic then many people who have gone on record claiming it's a hoax are going to look awfully stupid, or be vindicated and proven they were right all along.

      I say let's do it!

      Delete
  4. One thing about the plaque which wasn't mentioned was whether the text appears authentic. In particular I noticed "U" is shaped as "V" which it would've been. But is the language authentic? Also, regarding the zinc content - isn't it possible that Drake smelted from local ore? He dismissed the alleged mooring rock's hole as too recent, but did he bother to examine the debris inside the hole?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DaveK,

      The debris in the round hole was recently filled with local rocks from the beach and a small crab hiding among them. That hole was not 450 years old in my opinion as the rock was extremely soft. Besides; ships like the Golden Hinde would have used an anchor in a protected harbor like that and ferried people to the shore in a smaller boat.

      Delete
  5. One of the reasons why I love your show is you discover history that I never knew about! I was not aware of Sir Francis Drake's voyage to the West Coast and the Drake Plaque reminded me so much of the Kensington Runestone! Great show!
    Nick

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nick,

      In some ways history is repeating itself with the Drake plate. All initial indicators from my cursory examination look good for it being authentic. However, the prevailing "wisdom" thinks it's a hoax based solely on rumor and innuendo. We had permission to take the next step with non-invasive testing and for no good reason one of the curators asserted herself in a blatant power trip with no justification.

      At some point I hope to get another shot at testing that plate!

      Delete
  6. Why was there no mention of checking whether the zinc content might be consistent with local ores? Surely drake didn't lade bronze for the sole purpose of making a plaque in California. Was the debris in the alleged mooring rock checked?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DaveK,

      I looked at the 1970s zinc content test results and to be frank, was unimpressed. Brass with virtually any zinc content could have been made in recent times or back then. It is NOT a definitive test for when it was made.

      As far as checking local ores, if there are any zinc ores in the Francisco Bay area, it would be a wasted effort as the plate was reportedly a blank piece of brass that was brought along on the voyage and re-purposed as the plate. The inscription was stamped with a straight-edged tool and a British coin attached in the lower right corner.

      I'm confident we can figure out authenticity with non-invasive methods; we just need to be given the go-ahead.

      Delete
  7. Scott,

    Wouldn't a brass plate left to the elements have disintegrated a long time ago? I've seen half disintegrated brass from being left to the ravages of a damp basement.

    Anthony Warren

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony,

      Not necessarily, it all depends on the conditions of the soil environment it was preserved in. We will never know the exact location where it came from. However, we might be able to date any organic deposits still present on the surface.

      Delete
  8. Burrow cave. 1977 Carbondale, IL breakfast. An older guy with turquoise jewelry on sat at my table. We started talking. He showed me an artifact. He told me he was looking for silver or gold fell thru undergrowth into a cave. I thought he said he repelled into it by accident. Quietly said it is filled w/ancient items & stone tools. I think South of Cape Giradoedo along Miss River.I told to tell SIU archeology dept. No, no this is mine & claimed up. I think he said moved here from Pikes Peak area where he hunted turquoise & gold.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown,

      I'm not exactly sure what you're saying, but the person you may have met was Russell Burrows who claimed to have discovered a cave filled with treasure and artifacts. I'm skeptical of that claim, but time will tell.

      Delete