My next guest blogger is a name familiar to anyone who studies the Templars. If you don’t already own it, get Alan’s book, Sheep: The Remarkable Story of the Humble Animal that Built the Modern World. It is a fascinating read.
While traveling through France with us on the season finale, we stopped at the Commanderie d’Arville. There we discussed how important these humble animals were to the Templars and the entire history of Europe.
I'm delighted that Alan agreed to author this blog post.
- Blog post by Alan Butler February 16th 2015
The names mentioned by Steve in his fascinating blog are ones I have seen so often as I have travelled up and down Britain on my own research. Knowledge of the interconnectedness of the bloodlines that funded the rise and success of the Templars has always been lacking, which is why it is so important the researchers such as Steve are spending so much time and effort filling in the gaps.
As Steve said in his blog it was almost a revelation to me on the America Unearthed shoot in France to hear him mention the Counts of Champagne. So often we researchers feel ourselves to be in a minority of one and it is the true importance of this little band of historians Scott has brought together that we can shine the light of our own respective findings on the same subjects. Following Steve’s blog it was an email comment from another of our band, Bill Mann in Canada that put me in mind of a Templar symbol we saw often on the shoot in France and of something that drew these great families together.
I remember years ago, when my attention first turned towards the Counts of Champagne and I began to understand what an amazing part they and the nobles to whom they were related had played, not only in Templarism but also in terms of the gradual growth of the modern world. Something all these families had in common, once William of Normandy had settled land upon them after he became King of England in 1066 was the importance they placed upon sheep and the wool they produced.
Indeed, part of William of Normandy’s desire to ‘be’ King of England was because of its wealth, much of which had come, right back to Roman times from the raising of sheep. Britain generally is very suited to this animal and they still thrive on our moors and uplands. Those nobles who fought with William at Hastings were given vast land holdings and a large part of the wealth they drew from their English and eventually Scottish lands stemmed from large flocks of sheep.
The Counts of Champagne, through their association with the Cistercians and then also the Templars certainly did not invent sheep husbandry but they turned it into an art form. It is no coincidence that one of the main emblems of the Knights Templar was the device known as the Agnus Dei. From a Christian perspective Agnus Dei means the Lamb of God and of course in this context it referred to Jesus but I have always been sure that this picture of a lamb carrying a cross was much more than a religious symbol to the Knights Templar. It demonstrated in no uncertain terms where a great deal of Templar money came from.
At Cistercian Abbeys all over Europe, but especially in Britain and also on Templar farms, of which there were once many hundreds, countless thousands of sheep were bred on marginal land that was fitted for little else. Their wool was a yearly cash crop and after having been cleaned, spun and woven, often in Flanders, most of it found its way to a series of great markets that were deliberately set up by the Counts of Champagne. These were known as the Champagne Fairs. It was a win – win situation for everyone concerned. The Cistercian order of monks spread across Europe in record time, whilst the Templars eventually became a vast network, with fighting being only one strand of their raison d’etre.
All of this came as a gradual revelation to me in my first years of research but I eventually began to realise that what had happened represented something far more significant than a new departure in animal rearing. The very existence of wool, its importance and the high prices people were willing to pay for the best wool began to undermine the very foundations of feudal government in Europe. The wool trade was international. For example raw wool from Britain was worked into cloth in Flanders, after which some of it was sold via the Champagne Fairs to merchants in Italy. There the woollen cloth was improved, ornamented and made into rich garments, some of which found their way back, via the Champagne Fairs to Britain.
Quite quickly it became almost impossible for Kings to control events in the way they had once done. Economic power passed down from the monarchs and the great Lords to merchants and even those who were breeding the sheep. New wealth from wool bought luxury goods, books and education. A new internationalism developed to such an extent that the feudal genii could never be put back into its bottle. It is my absolute contention that this was no chance consequence and I firmly believe that the changes that began to take place in Europe and which eventually led to the Renaissance were deliberately engineered in the palaces of Champagne and other French regions as early as the middle of the 11th century.
Back in the days when I was co-operating with Canadian writer Stephen Dafoe we coined the term ‘Templar Inc’ because we began to see a vast international company, the huge assets of which were constantly being used to foster more trade and to create new opportunities. Medieval kings did not understand how such a system worked, which made it all the more annoying for the French King Phillip IV when after 1307 he never found the vast chests of Templar gold he had expected.
In their day the Templars were responsible to no authority other than that of the Pope, and since even the Pope was invariably in their debt, they had every opportunity to change the world in which they lived and operated. But none of this would have been remotely possible were it not for the sheep that in the form of the Agnus Dei they kept as their major symbol throughout their existence.
This is of course a very short version of a long and fascinating story, because it was the sheep that as good as built the modern world, long after the days of those Medieval Lords. It might come as a surprise to some readers of this blog to learn that the sheep also had a very significant part to play in the founding of a free United States. Much is made of tea taxes as a spur to revolution but far more important was the fact that farmers in the American colonies were prohibiting from breeding better sheep and were prevented from importing new bloodstock from Europe on pain of lengthy imprisonment. To men such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, who were farmers themselves, this was an intolerable situation and a major stepping stone on the path to the Declaration of Independence.
If any of the readers of this blog happen to be in London any time soon, they might want to take themselves to the Temple district. This is now a great centre for legal training, though of course the original Templar Church can still be seen there. Even today, over seven hundred years after the Knights Templer were ‘supposed’ to have been destroyed, the sheep of the Agnus Dei can still be seen looking down from practically every building – as if those white-mantled knights with their illustrious family names never went away at all.
Showing posts with label America Unearthed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label America Unearthed. Show all posts
Monday, February 16, 2015
Saturday, February 14, 2015
St. Clair Sinclair DNA and the Templars
My friend, Steve St. Clair, was very excited about showing me Saint Martin des Champs in Paris. He, Alan Butler, Janet and I had many talks about why this was so important to him. In fact, he had a Power Point show with him when we met up at Troyes to educate us about why we had to include St Martin des Champs in the episode. So we did.
The connections Steve found at Saint Martin des Champs prove without any doubt that the Sinclair / St. Clair family of Herdmanston were closely connected to, and in several cases, directly descended from important Templar families.
Today, I’d like turn this space over to guest blogger Steve to explain his research. _________________________________________________

First, thanks Scott for the opportunity to be a guest blogger here. Looking at the pics you’ve put up of our trip to France, I have to wonder why we didn’t include our wives in the season finale. The episodes would have been much better looking! Anita and I had great trip and a lot of fun hanging out with you, Janet, Alan Butler, and of course Maria & Andy and the wonderful crew from Committee Films.
I remember the night in the hotel’s small bar when we were all quite tired - none more than Alan who had flown over that day and had quite a drive to meet us. I pulled out my computer to show you guys a presentation about what I was finding regarding the priory of Saint Martin des Champs. Near the end, I mentioned that my greatest interest was the Counts of Champagne because it was becoming clear to me that they were connected to the Saint-Clair family. Alan, tired as he was, lit up, “The Counts of Champagne were the money behind the Templars!”
Over the course of the next couple days, Alan wasn’t feeling very well (the weather was pretty miserable), so I drove his rental car with him in the passenger seat. We had a lot of time to chat in-depth about the importance of the Counts of Champagne, the Champagne Fairs, and much more. It has been collaborations like these over the past many years that has made my own research into the DNA and history of the Saint-Clair family much more accurate, interesting, and engaging.
Many of the angry skeptics, who take pot shots at the show from the peanut gallery, don’t seem to realize how such shows are made. After commercials, each episode of America Unearthed is 44 minutes. That doesn’t leave a ton of time to go into extreme detail about the research being shown. An example is my work on Saint Martin des Champs. It took me 16 months to research and write the 6,000 word paper now on my Sinclair DNA website at this link – http://www.stclairresearch.com/content/Sinclair-Templar-Proof.html
That recent website post at St Clair Sinclair DNA Research is generating quite a bit of interest, both from those who welcome it, and those who are upset by my claims.
The facts are the facts. At some point, the pundits must come out with legitimate evidence to dispute my claims, or slink away with their tails between their legs. The beauty of DNA is that it doesn’t lie. People who have something to gain can attempt to bend the truth, but the data itself is brutally visible.
I’ve seen several people in our own DNA study attempt to use their results to make terribly weak claims. Yet the science of DNA always wins out, much like Scott’s research into artifacts like the Kensington Runestone and the Tucson Lead Artifacts.
Stones and DNA are both factual, scientific evidence. As Scott said in part 1 of the season finale, the fakes reveal themselves quickly, but the legitimate ones just won’t go away.
Several years ago after extensive reading of medieval benefaction records to priories and abbeys, I realized that the medievalists I most admired were skirting around something. They seemed to be heavily focused on medieval people with different surnames who were donating land and money to the same abbeys. But they seemed reluctant to make too many definitive claims.
For instance, a particular abbey called Savigny in France. It was one of only a couple abbeys I have found to which the St. Clairs directly donated lands. Yet, notice the other families also donating land there:
The clues above are why I’m so obsessed by these names. But not just because of their benefaction to abbeys and priories.
People changed their names at the drop of a hat in medieval times – move to new land, take your second name from that new land. Eventually these names stuck.
They were all related. Their surnames were not yet fixed.
So now, if you were to find two people alive today with the same DNA, yet one’s name is Vilers, and the other is St. Clair…guess what…they both descend from the same medieval family.
And it became very clear by doing detailed research into which families were giving gifts to the priory of Saint Martin des Champs in Paris. But that’s only one religious house. There are many others that I’m digging into.
We’re not just talking about DNA SNP matches:
Scott, Janet, and Alan, I’m delighted we got to chase the Templars through France. And I think we’re just getting started.
Steve St. Clair
The connections Steve found at Saint Martin des Champs prove without any doubt that the Sinclair / St. Clair family of Herdmanston were closely connected to, and in several cases, directly descended from important Templar families.
Today, I’d like turn this space over to guest blogger Steve to explain his research. _________________________________________________
Saint Martin des Champs, Paris
Merovingian burial, Saint Martin des Chanps
The chequy armorial at Tomar Portugal,
reminiscent of Warenne or Vaux of county Norfolk, England.
We saw several other sites besides the ones you saw on the season finale.
This is a painting at Saint-Sulpice, Paris.
I remember the night in the hotel’s small bar when we were all quite tired - none more than Alan who had flown over that day and had quite a drive to meet us. I pulled out my computer to show you guys a presentation about what I was finding regarding the priory of Saint Martin des Champs. Near the end, I mentioned that my greatest interest was the Counts of Champagne because it was becoming clear to me that they were connected to the Saint-Clair family. Alan, tired as he was, lit up, “The Counts of Champagne were the money behind the Templars!”
Over the course of the next couple days, Alan wasn’t feeling very well (the weather was pretty miserable), so I drove his rental car with him in the passenger seat. We had a lot of time to chat in-depth about the importance of the Counts of Champagne, the Champagne Fairs, and much more. It has been collaborations like these over the past many years that has made my own research into the DNA and history of the Saint-Clair family much more accurate, interesting, and engaging.
Many of the angry skeptics, who take pot shots at the show from the peanut gallery, don’t seem to realize how such shows are made. After commercials, each episode of America Unearthed is 44 minutes. That doesn’t leave a ton of time to go into extreme detail about the research being shown. An example is my work on Saint Martin des Champs. It took me 16 months to research and write the 6,000 word paper now on my Sinclair DNA website at this link – http://www.stclairresearch.com/content/Sinclair-Templar-Proof.html
That recent website post at St Clair Sinclair DNA Research is generating quite a bit of interest, both from those who welcome it, and those who are upset by my claims.
The facts are the facts. At some point, the pundits must come out with legitimate evidence to dispute my claims, or slink away with their tails between their legs. The beauty of DNA is that it doesn’t lie. People who have something to gain can attempt to bend the truth, but the data itself is brutally visible.
I’ve seen several people in our own DNA study attempt to use their results to make terribly weak claims. Yet the science of DNA always wins out, much like Scott’s research into artifacts like the Kensington Runestone and the Tucson Lead Artifacts.
Stones and DNA are both factual, scientific evidence. As Scott said in part 1 of the season finale, the fakes reveal themselves quickly, but the legitimate ones just won’t go away.
In this blog post, I want to talk about the evidence that just won’t go away in the St Clair Sinclair DNA study
Several years ago after extensive reading of medieval benefaction records to priories and abbeys, I realized that the medievalists I most admired were skirting around something. They seemed to be heavily focused on medieval people with different surnames who were donating land and money to the same abbeys. But they seemed reluctant to make too many definitive claims.
For instance, a particular abbey called Savigny in France. It was one of only a couple abbeys I have found to which the St. Clairs directly donated lands. Yet, notice the other families also donating land there:
- Vilers (a brother of Norman St. Clairs.)
- Montfort (tenant and likely related to St. Clairs.)
- Creon (Templar family.)
- Meulan (major land holder and likely related to St. Clair.)
- D’Albini (descendants of the Honour of Belvoir and to which the St. Clairs married into. Directly related to the Counts of Champagne.)
- Mandeville (Geoffrey de Mandeville, made a Knight Templar on his deathbed and founder of the Temple Church in London, the single most important Templar building in England.)
- Vaux (married into the d’Albini family. I’m directly related to the de Vaux)
- Bisset (witnessed the grant of land to the Sinclairs of Rosslyn and showing up in the DNA SNP matches of our Exeter Lineage.)
The clues above are why I’m so obsessed by these names. But not just because of their benefaction to abbeys and priories.
People changed their names at the drop of a hat in medieval times – move to new land, take your second name from that new land. Eventually these names stuck.
The names changed, but the DNA did not
Richard de Vilers was a brother of Haimo and William de St. Clair in about the year 1120. Those brothers gave the land of Richard de Vilers to Savigny, with the permission of Stephen count of Mortain. (Savigny was an unusually important Cistercian Abbey in the diocese of Avranches, France.) Hubert of Saint-Clair was a tenant of the count of Mortain in Somerset.They were all related. Their surnames were not yet fixed.
So now, if you were to find two people alive today with the same DNA, yet one’s name is Vilers, and the other is St. Clair…guess what…they both descend from the same medieval family.
Finding people closely allied in medieval records
+
Finding two people alive today with those same two surnames
who match closely in DNA SNPs
=
Both are descendants of the medieval people.
This is precisely what I’ve found
But these weren’t just any connections. The Saint-Clairs of Herdmanston have connections to those at the very top of the founding of the Order of the Temple.And it became very clear by doing detailed research into which families were giving gifts to the priory of Saint Martin des Champs in Paris. But that’s only one religious house. There are many others that I’m digging into.
We’re not just talking about DNA SNP matches:
- Particular families alive today are in the DNA SNP matches of the Herdmanston family. That’s SNP matches. They share paternal blood with particular families. It is irrefutable.
- Those particular families fit the narrative of the Saint-Clair family. What do I mean by that? I mean if you go back and study the actual records of the Saint-Clair family, then you will understand that you must show some of these same particular families in your DNA SNP matches to make any claim of connecting to the narrative of that particular Saint-Clair family story.
- The particular families who fit into the narrative of our Saint-Clair family story in medieval records of land, benefaction, and/or marriage?
- Mandeville
- Wishart
- Strathern
- Bisset
- Moreville
- Redver
- Viller
- Warenne
- Vaux
- Ashley
- Urtaico
- Mortimer
- Etc.
Scott, Janet, and Alan, I’m delighted we got to chase the Templars through France. And I think we’re just getting started.
Steve St. Clair
Saturday, January 31, 2015
Two Brand New Medieval Hooked X's
Janet and Anita St. Clair flash the "M" sign along with a model of lady Liberty at St. Martin's des Champ, in Paris, France. |
Have you ever looked closely at the tablet Lady Liberty holds in her left hand? |
After all the microscopic analysis and high resolution imaging at the Westford Knight/Sword Hooked X, sometimes the best way to see something is with an IPhone flashlight. |
Well, season 3 is now over and I want to personally thank everyone who supported u watching our show. I hope you've learned some new things and were entertained in the process. We're hoping for another season as there is so much more to explore and share with all of you; we'll see what happens!
Before I launch into comments about the part 2 of Tracking the Templars, I'd like to share comments posted on Facebook last week that were forwarded to me by a relative of the person who carved the fake rune stone seen in part 1. It was the guy on the right without the hat who actually thought I was the one who looked like the fool in the episode. Obviously, I would disagree and will let you decide for yourself what this correspondence means:
Billy Carney did you see me on the History channel Saturday
(Name Removed)
(Name Removed)No Billy. What was the show , cause I have
unlimited history channel in the web.
Billy Carney it's on the History2's website, follow the link
for "America Unearthed" I'm in the green shirt. I'm in the first 20
minutes after that they move onto another subject...
Jean Carney Blakesley I just watched it. It is
nice to see that he gave you credit for finding it. He sure changed
his tune from the time that I e-mailed him before.
Billy Carney yes, he had enough on me to feed me to the
lions, the History channel people probably stepped in and told him he can't do
what he wants to do
Billy Carney I did carve that inscription
Billy Carney I didn't find it, I made it...
Jean Carney Blakesley No you didn't. Not that
one.
Billy Carney yeah, it was a hoax from the beginning
Jean Carney Blakesley Really. You sure had me
fooled.
Billy Carney Scott offered counsin Joe $1000 to appear on
camera and talk about my carvings
Jean Carney Blakesley Did they ever pay you anything for
appearing on TV?
Billy Carney not a thing, I went in the hole about a couple
hundred $'s running around getting things ready for them to come here
Jean Carney Blakesley I just sent the link to my brother
Jim.
Billy Carney cousin joe milked $300 out of them, that's his
yellow atv in the beginning
Billy Carney coool
Billy Carney you guys were so easy to fool
Jean Carney Blakesley The above picture doesn't look like
the other one. spacing is different
Billy Carney no, same one, look closer....
Billy Carney i'll try and find a later one
Jean Carney Blakesley I hadn't watched the whole show before
I made my comments. I have to say, you are one warped individual.
Billy Carney high strung people don't like it I know.....
Jean Carney Blakesley It was one thing to try to make a fool
of Scott, but to make a fool of your friends. Not good.
Billy Carney yeah,ok
Billy Carney that's why I don't let you see my posts
anymore, we're two different kinfs of people. Have fun being uptight
Billy Carney right up there with the Charles Manson murders
huh ?
Billy Carney when Joe and Josh found out last week the truth
we all had a good laugh....you,joannie, John, well a diffeent story.....
Jean Carney Blakesley I am not an uptight person, I am a
very loving, caring person who stood up for you. I didn't block you
or unfriend you even when you would go too far with some of you ribbing. You
have no boundaries. I feel that it is a sin to waste valuable time
on resources on childish behavior.
Billy Carney I begged you not to say anything to Scott and
stand up for me but you couldn't be stopped....
Jean Carney Blakesley It was because I cared about you and
thought that he was making a fool of you. I guess you don't know
what it is like to care for someone or someones feelings.
Billy Carney no boundaries, yeah right
Billy Carney to you it's like the OJ Simpson murders etc
Billy Carney it's a stone carving !
Billy Carney just enjoy your up tightness
Billy Carney form a support group
Billy Carney it's a stone carving !
Billy Carney one day stone carving, tomorrow murder....
Billy Carney lol
Billy Carney why have I only had these kinds of disscussions
in the past year with you,Joannie and John......
Billy Carney there's your nucleus of a support group...
Billy Carney it's a stone carving......
Billy Carney sorry I brought this up Stacy, left my guard
down, didn't realize Miss Uptight would see it...
What strikes me is how Billy is totally oblivious to the seriousness of his actions. Pathetic really; but at least know the answer definitively even though I suspected him all along.
Moving on now; what is truly amazing is finding not one, but two Hooked X symbols connected with the Knights Templar. The stand alone Roman number 10 Hooked X in Santa Maria de Olival is unquestionably Templar and the extensively weathered Hooked X proves the Westford Knight/Sword is indeed Templar (likely carved for a fallen knight) in origin as most have always suspected. What this new evidence does is reinforce our conclusions about the rune stones with the Hooked X found in North America. These are important finds that need to be taken seriously by scholars. I hold out no hope they will as to touch this research completely changes to the paradigm of known world history profoundly. The real question is: does anyone have the courage to tip their toes into these amazing waters? Time will tell...
Follow @RealScottWolter
Follow @RealScottWolter
Saturday, January 24, 2015
"Venus Families" founded the Cistercians and Knights Templar.
Steve and Anita St. Clair, Alan Bulter, and Janet and Scott Wolter pose along the swollen Seine River in Paris, France. |
One of several AVM's in stained glass in the Church at the Templar Commandery at Arville, France. |
Scott, Steve St. Clair and Alan Butler, pose for a photo inside the Church at the Templar Commandery at Arville, France. Is it a coincidence that a statue of Jesus is directly behind Steve? |
![]() |
A kaleidoscope of "M" signs adorn Mary encircled with twelve angels in this painting hanging inside the Church at the Templar Commandery at Arville, France. |
The trip to France with Janet, Steve St. Clair and his wife Anita, and Alan Butler, was truly a once-in-a-lifetime experience that turned out to be better than any of us could have imagined. We arrived early to visit locations we knew we wouldn't have time for with the crew while shooting, and discovered a number of things that furthered our Cistercian/Templar research immensely. We found so many new and interesting things that this planned single episode turned into the two-part adventure you just saw the beginning of. I hope the larger than normal number of photos I posted this week will spark questions from those who read this blog as I could have written several paragraphs about each one. I also hope this episode has opened the eyes of our viewers to some of the signs, symbols and tokens used by the Venus Families and their supporters, such as the five-pointed star, the "M" sign, AVM, the Fleur des les, the Cross of Lorraine, and the Hooked X, that are hidden in plain sight both in Europe and North America!
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Who Carved the Waubansee Stone?
The Committee Films crew with guest Scott Mastores (second from left) after wrapping the final shoot. |
Scott, field producer, Paula Engelking (left side) and guest, Dr. Scott Mastores, with his daughter Katie, pose with the Waubansee Stone at a secret location outside of Chicago. |
A closer view of the face carved on the Waubansee Stone shows the hole in the mouth where water was designed to flow from the bowl on top.
|
It's difficult for people to imagine these days, but the landscape of the Great Lakes region in the post-glacial period two to five millennia ago looked much different than it does today. In fact, at one point of what is now the Chicago River that flows into Lake Michigan, the river likely flowed directly out of the lake to the Mississippi. As the continental ice sheets melted back, lake levels were constantly changing. Isostatic rebound of the earth's crust from the removal of the immense weight of the ice also created dramatic changes in lake levels and the flow of rivers and streams over the past five thousand years. Remember, because of differences in water levels in the past, there almost certainly were easier travel routes for larger vessels between the individual Great Lakes than they would be now. Excluding of course, modern canals and locks.
In any case, the most likely scenario for me is the Phoenicians, and/or whichever ancient cultures in the America's that were involved in the early mining of copper in the Lake Superior region. I'm certainly open to other possibilities, such as the Mayans, Aztecs, or some other early Native American group as the carvers of the mysterious face, but I'm not at all receptive to the notion that a soldier with the advanced skills, appropriate tools, and time on his hands at Fort Dearborn had anything to do with it. Therefore, this makes the Waubansee Stone one the most historically important and valuable artifacts in North America. In my opinion, it should be front page news and I'm hopeful that it will soon be prominently displayed for the American public to see and ponder.
Sunday, December 21, 2014
Great Walls in China and California
Scott and Mr. Dong at the incredible Great Wall. |
Rear Admiral Zheng Ming poses with Scott in front of a bronze statue of Admiral Zheng Hu. |
Our Chinese interpreter, Crystal, waits inside the stone and fired brick bastion along the "wild" portion of the Great Wall in China. |
Rear Admiral Zheng Ming holds court with interpreter Crystal and the Committee Films crew. |
Both of my guests in China were wonderful; especially Rear Admiral Zheng Ming. He is 82 years old and a hero to the Chinese who was so knowledgeable, kind, and humble. He was so happy to have us there to talk about Chinese exploration and was genuinely thrilled to have Americans' learn about their history. The morning we left to fly home, the admiral got up at 4:00 a.m. and was waiting to meet us in the hotel lobby to see us off. We were all genuinely touched by this man whom the Chinese have every right to be very proud of. The Chinese are also very proud of their historical hero, Admiral Zheng Hu. I am embarrassed to say I had not heard of him prior to filming this episode. His accomplishments on his seven voyages are staggering and the lack of knowledge in the United States about this amazing explorer says a lot about how Eurocentric our education system is. It's understandable to a point, but this is one man we should be learning about in history class.
I was also unaware of were the mysterious stone walls in California prior to filming that were brought to my attention through the tip line. Since there is no known historical record of the origin of the walls, and it appears the surviving local native tribes have no intact oral stories about who made them, they truly are a mystery. To me, the two most plausible explanations are local natives built them, but have lost the knowledge of the ancestors work. The could also have been built to mark territory by a visiting culture most likely from the Far East. Having been built primarily at the top of the mountains, it seems unlikely they were constructed to keep in livestock or to keep out advancing enemies. Because of their tradition of building walls just like these along with the more massive sections of the Great Wall, the Chinese are a legitimate possibility to have created them.
More important than the origin of the California stone walls was the incredible map evidence both Dr. Gunnar Thompson and Dr. Lee shared with me. The detail displayed in the geography of North, South, and Central America could only have been obtained through detailed mapping by cartographers from numerous pre-Columbian voyages to these continents. The skeptics are going to mash their teeth and their keyboards trying to explain away the Chinese component of the early history of the America's. I'll bet many Native American tribes have knowledge preserved somewhere about the highly advanced navigators from the Far East who almost certainly visited BOTH sides of our continent.
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Davey Crockett and Secrets from the Alamo
At the beginning of this episode I was
skeptical of the premise Crockett could have survived the Alamo. However,
things got interesting quickly when the land deed and the newspaper articles
began to open my eyes. The chances are very good that he did survive choosing
then to live out his days after the Alamo in a quiet, low-key lifestyle. This
begs many questions and speculation as to why? If he did survive and went on to
live a secret life, why would he sign his real name on the land deed? Perhaps
it was to ensure the property would legally stay in the family. One thing that
impacted me was the land deed was signed by the President, James Buchanan,
another Mason, who likely knew Crockett was alive and made sure the land
transaction was approved for a “Brother” who had served his country with honor
and distinction even then, and deserved a peaceful and quiet retirement.
.
Like many American icons, when you dig deeper into their past to try and understand who they really were, you are often surprised. I found it interesting to learn that his grandparents were killed by Indians whom he despised as a very young man. Later, he became very ill at one point and was nursed back to health by Natives he lived with and came to understand. This led to a better understanding and appreciation of Native culture. When he eventually became a United States senator, he was an avid supporter of Native American rights which created a rift between he and President Andrew Jackson. This contentious relationship may have played a role in Crockett’s desire to disappear when the opportunity came after the Alamo.
Our theory that both Crockett and Santa Anna used the Masonic sign of distress to save their lives takes on added significance when you consider that Crockett likely wasn’t the only person whose life was saved at the Alamo through Masonic connections. Our guest at the Scottish Rite Temple in Minneapolis, Jack Roberts, who also happens to be a Texas native in addition to a Freemason, relayed a legendary story about how two of the three only known survivors walked away from the Alamo. Those survivors were the wife, Susanna, and infant child, Angelina Elizabeth, of Captain Almaron Dickinson. According to Jack, the legend within the Craft is before the final assault, Captain Dickinson reportedly gave his Masonic apron to his wife and told her to cover herself with it when the enemy captured them. There are a couple of versions of this story you can read at these links, but the premise of soldiers and their family members surviving vicious battles throughout history due to Masonic affiliations is nothing new.
http://www.tamu.edu/faculty/ccbn/dewitt/adp/history/bios/dickenson/dickinson_susannah.html
http://issuu.com/momason/docs/gl_proceedings_1978/222
If Crockett did survive and live on, the question becomes why did we never hear about it? There are all kinds of possibilities, but one idea that makes sense to me is the United States Government propaganda machine didn’t want news to leak out about any survivors. They likely feared the now famous slogan, “Remember the Alamo” might not been the powerful inspiration it came to be had a famous person like Crockett been known to survive. That all the soldier’s died at the Alamo served to ‘fuel the fire’ of soldiers in subsequent battles that led to important victories.
Part of me that wants to believe this courageous American hero did survive, and at the age 50 after the bloody battle at the Alamo he decided he had had enough. If anybody out there has any more clues that could shed additional light about Crockett, I’d love to hear about it.
Like many American icons, when you dig deeper into their past to try and understand who they really were, you are often surprised. I found it interesting to learn that his grandparents were killed by Indians whom he despised as a very young man. Later, he became very ill at one point and was nursed back to health by Natives he lived with and came to understand. This led to a better understanding and appreciation of Native culture. When he eventually became a United States senator, he was an avid supporter of Native American rights which created a rift between he and President Andrew Jackson. This contentious relationship may have played a role in Crockett’s desire to disappear when the opportunity came after the Alamo.
Our theory that both Crockett and Santa Anna used the Masonic sign of distress to save their lives takes on added significance when you consider that Crockett likely wasn’t the only person whose life was saved at the Alamo through Masonic connections. Our guest at the Scottish Rite Temple in Minneapolis, Jack Roberts, who also happens to be a Texas native in addition to a Freemason, relayed a legendary story about how two of the three only known survivors walked away from the Alamo. Those survivors were the wife, Susanna, and infant child, Angelina Elizabeth, of Captain Almaron Dickinson. According to Jack, the legend within the Craft is before the final assault, Captain Dickinson reportedly gave his Masonic apron to his wife and told her to cover herself with it when the enemy captured them. There are a couple of versions of this story you can read at these links, but the premise of soldiers and their family members surviving vicious battles throughout history due to Masonic affiliations is nothing new.
http://www.tamu.edu/faculty/ccbn/dewitt/adp/history/bios/dickenson/dickinson_susannah.html
http://issuu.com/momason/docs/gl_proceedings_1978/222
If Crockett did survive and live on, the question becomes why did we never hear about it? There are all kinds of possibilities, but one idea that makes sense to me is the United States Government propaganda machine didn’t want news to leak out about any survivors. They likely feared the now famous slogan, “Remember the Alamo” might not been the powerful inspiration it came to be had a famous person like Crockett been known to survive. That all the soldier’s died at the Alamo served to ‘fuel the fire’ of soldiers in subsequent battles that led to important victories.
Part of me that wants to believe this courageous American hero did survive, and at the age 50 after the bloody battle at the Alamo he decided he had had enough. If anybody out there has any more clues that could shed additional light about Crockett, I’d love to hear about it.
Director Raul Cadena gets serious at the altar in the Scottish Rite Temple in Minneapolis.
Joy Bland's husband, Mike Hartzell, Will Yates, Brandon Boulay, Joy Bland and Scott.
Archaeologist Michael Arbuthnot gets his drone ready for a flight
at the suspected Davey Crockett property.
An interesting AVM keystone at the entrance to the Alamo.
Which Mary was it supposed to honor?
An arrowhead found by Scott near the homestead of Davey Crockett.
Scott proudly diplays his jasper arrowhead.
Sunday, September 14, 2014
So what about that “Apparently Non-Existent” Honorary Master’s Degree?
Shortly after the premier of our show America Unearthed in December of 2012, an internet “debunker” wrote a blog intimating that I was falsely claiming I had received an Honorary Master’s Degree in Geology in 1987. The blog was cleverly written so as to not outright assert I was misrepresenting my qualifications, but it certainly did give readers the impression I was somehow claiming to be somebody I wasn’t.
Unfortunately, this misleading post has made its way to the top position on Google when people search for my name looking for information about me. Even though I responded to the post explaining how and why I received the degree, my response was at first left up on blog, but has since been removed thereby furthering the myth the blogger created. Because I often receive sometimes nasty criticism generated by this particular blog post, I felt I should re-address the issue head-on in a blog post of my own. While the debunker’s post falls just short of the bar necessary to initiate legal action, future events could change the current situation.
Another reason I felt compelled to address this subject, is that the person whose idea it was to recognize me way back then recently passed away. Professor Emeritus, Charles L. “Charlie” Matsch, died suddenly on April 20th of this year at the age of 83. I owe much of whatever success I’ve had in my career to Charlie who steered me toward geology when I was clueless freshman at the University of Minnesota at Duluth (UMD).
The late Professor Emeritus Dr. Charles L. Matsch and I pose for a photo after my lecture on Lake Superior agates at the University of Minnesota-Duluth in the spring of 1987. Charlie and my other former professors gave me a “sympathy” Honorary Master’s for my 1986 book, The Lake Superior Agate.
In August of 1983, I completed my 6-week geology field camp classwork and was ready to begin my job search. Charlie contacted me about interviewing for a position as a field geologist with a Mapco Minerals. Due in part to Charlie’s recommendation I was hired. It turned out the first project was in Northern Minnesota where I was hired to traverse and map the glacially scoured bedrock. The job also required that I slog my way into a seemingly endless number of swamps to hand drill through the floating bogs up 30 feet down to the underlying bedrock to collect basal clay samples looking for gold. It was a physically demanding job, but I was in good shape after four years of playing college football and I really enjoyed being in the woods. After three months the Minnesota project ended and I was offered a full-time position that was to begin in January in Nevada. I was excited to get my professional career going as were my parents, Barbara and Fred.
Upon returning home to the Twin Cities in November, my father, a pilot with Northwest Airlines for the past 25 years said, “You’re no longer a dependent, so you get one more pass to fly anywhere in the world so you better make it good. Where do you want to go?” With over a month before I started the next field assignment in Nevada; I was excited to take the trip of a lifetime. One of my favorite hobbies was scuba diving and decided I wanted to go the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Being close to my father, I asked if he wanted to go with me.
Our plan was to be gone for three weeks and over the first eight days we were in Hawaii, Japan, and China before arriving in Cairns, Australia. After hustling our way onto a boat and camping out the night before, we arrived on the dock the next morning for the three-hour trip to the Great Barrier Reef. This was the moment we were waiting for and after the boat was anchored in a tidal channel on the reef, 25 or so snorkelers jumped into the water for a spear-fishing contest. Once the snorkelers were clear, my father and I excitedly jumped in with our scuba tanks. Within minutes of entering the water we became separated in the murky, sediment-filled water flowing out to sea with the tide. After searching for several minutes, I grew annoyed wondering where he was and headed back to the boat. As I climbed onto the boat, a few of the snorkelers were just setting him down after pulling him from the water. I knew instantly that he was gone. Exactly why my father, who was an experienced diver, died from saltwater drowning that day is still a mystery.
Needless-to-say both my family and my world changed forever. After my return I was in no condition to take the job with Mapco and over the next two years I struggled trying to find my career and my confidence. To help work through the grief and guilt, I spend countless hours in local gravel pits collecting agates, and my thoughts, trying to understand what had happened. I immersed myself in everything agates and at one point was inspired to write a book about agates by my agate mentor, George Flaim of Duluth, Minnesota. Thanks to George’s prodding I embraced the project and with the input of many people along way, including Charlie and my other UMD professors who reviewed my geological research on the various types, modes of formation, microscopic features, glacial distribution, and history of collecting Lake Superior agates, the book was published in the fall of 1986.
My agate mentor, George Flaim, and I posed for a photo while negotiating a deal in his basement in Duluth, Minnesota, sometime around 1990.
It was a proud and defining moment in my life which helped me move on emotionally from the tragedy with my pride and confidence restored. The following spring, I was invited by the University to give a lecture at UMD about my agate research. Janet joined me for the lecture and afterward my former professors peppered me with technical questions that I answered. After the lecture they invited me to the professor’s lounge where Charlie announced the honorary degree complete with a whipped-cream topped cup of coffee.
The degree was certainly not officially recognized by the University, nor was it ever portrayed to be. It was simply an acknowledgement that my professors were proud of me for fighting through a tough experience, producing something scholarly, while getting my life back on track. I have always portrayed it as an honorary “sympathy” degree. However, it was an honor I was proud of back then and am still proud of today. The misleading blog post put my now elderly retired professors in an awkward position at being questioned about their kind gesture so many years ago. To have this important moment portrayed as somehow dishonest to try and discredit me and my research, only serves as further motivation.
In the future I’m sure we will all look back and recall these “Wild West” days of the Internet. I was prepared for the personal attacks and attempts to marginalize and dismiss my work on the controversial subject matter we investigate on the show and in real life. People like this aren’t really interested in the truth; they are interested in turning the attention onto themselves so they can espouse their own personal “beliefs.” In my view, the worst offender of bias and miss-information on the Internet is Wikipedia. This on-line resource that so many people in the world rely upon simply cannot be trusted; especially when it comes to topics about archaeology and the controversial artifacts I had researched extensively, such as the Kensington Rune Stone, the Tucson Lead Artifacts, and that Bat Creek Stone. They are portrayed as fakes in spite of the obvious and overwhelming factual evidence consistent with authenticity. The world is being manipulated by “Wiki” on these topics and it needs to be stopped.
Shortly after the show premiered, bogus references casting my research in an unfounded negative light began to appear on my Wiki bio page. I tried unsuccessfully to remove it only to have it reappear. Eventually, I demanded they remove the bogus information or delete my bio completely. I’d rather people not have a Wiki bio than to have one sentence in it that was false. An infuriating and condescending week-long debate ensued among the Wiki reviewers and only after threatening legal action did they finally remove my bio completely.
The same situation is currently happening to a brilliant researcher and friend, Charles Pellegrino. Charlie has also had his academic credentials questioned by Internet hackers who have posted false information on his Wiki bio page. Charlie lost his cousin on 9-11 and along with other families who lost loved ones that day has endured harassment and threats by 9-11 “Truthers” whose motives are despicable, and who are openly in charge of his Wikipedia biography. Charlie has also had research on the Titanic and the Talpiot Tomb unjustly criticized by those whose “beliefs” on these subjects are contrary to the factual evidence he and his colleagues have worked hard to document. He has also reached the point of frustration and disgust that he has demanded to have his Wiki bio page removed permanently.
At the end of day, all this banter about scholarly degrees, peer review, academic journals, and fraudulent Wikipedia articles are nothing more than a smokescreen by skeptics and debunkers who offer no meaningful contributions, and try to control and cloud the discussion with misleading and mean-spirited deception and nonsense. The bottom line is the soft-science academic “consensus of opinion” approach to history where there is little to no accountability has failed to find the truth. It’s long past time we put aside the “Myth of Columbus” and defer to the facts. Instead of the court of academic opinion, the factual evidence concerning our history should be considered in a court of law under oath by professionals who understand proper scientific method, ethical practices, and most importantly, accountability.
Unfortunately, this misleading post has made its way to the top position on Google when people search for my name looking for information about me. Even though I responded to the post explaining how and why I received the degree, my response was at first left up on blog, but has since been removed thereby furthering the myth the blogger created. Because I often receive sometimes nasty criticism generated by this particular blog post, I felt I should re-address the issue head-on in a blog post of my own. While the debunker’s post falls just short of the bar necessary to initiate legal action, future events could change the current situation.
Another reason I felt compelled to address this subject, is that the person whose idea it was to recognize me way back then recently passed away. Professor Emeritus, Charles L. “Charlie” Matsch, died suddenly on April 20th of this year at the age of 83. I owe much of whatever success I’ve had in my career to Charlie who steered me toward geology when I was clueless freshman at the University of Minnesota at Duluth (UMD).
The late Professor Emeritus Dr. Charles L. Matsch and I pose for a photo after my lecture on Lake Superior agates at the University of Minnesota-Duluth in the spring of 1987. Charlie and my other former professors gave me a “sympathy” Honorary Master’s for my 1986 book, The Lake Superior Agate.
In August of 1983, I completed my 6-week geology field camp classwork and was ready to begin my job search. Charlie contacted me about interviewing for a position as a field geologist with a Mapco Minerals. Due in part to Charlie’s recommendation I was hired. It turned out the first project was in Northern Minnesota where I was hired to traverse and map the glacially scoured bedrock. The job also required that I slog my way into a seemingly endless number of swamps to hand drill through the floating bogs up 30 feet down to the underlying bedrock to collect basal clay samples looking for gold. It was a physically demanding job, but I was in good shape after four years of playing college football and I really enjoyed being in the woods. After three months the Minnesota project ended and I was offered a full-time position that was to begin in January in Nevada. I was excited to get my professional career going as were my parents, Barbara and Fred.
Upon returning home to the Twin Cities in November, my father, a pilot with Northwest Airlines for the past 25 years said, “You’re no longer a dependent, so you get one more pass to fly anywhere in the world so you better make it good. Where do you want to go?” With over a month before I started the next field assignment in Nevada; I was excited to take the trip of a lifetime. One of my favorite hobbies was scuba diving and decided I wanted to go the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Being close to my father, I asked if he wanted to go with me.
Our plan was to be gone for three weeks and over the first eight days we were in Hawaii, Japan, and China before arriving in Cairns, Australia. After hustling our way onto a boat and camping out the night before, we arrived on the dock the next morning for the three-hour trip to the Great Barrier Reef. This was the moment we were waiting for and after the boat was anchored in a tidal channel on the reef, 25 or so snorkelers jumped into the water for a spear-fishing contest. Once the snorkelers were clear, my father and I excitedly jumped in with our scuba tanks. Within minutes of entering the water we became separated in the murky, sediment-filled water flowing out to sea with the tide. After searching for several minutes, I grew annoyed wondering where he was and headed back to the boat. As I climbed onto the boat, a few of the snorkelers were just setting him down after pulling him from the water. I knew instantly that he was gone. Exactly why my father, who was an experienced diver, died from saltwater drowning that day is still a mystery.
Needless-to-say both my family and my world changed forever. After my return I was in no condition to take the job with Mapco and over the next two years I struggled trying to find my career and my confidence. To help work through the grief and guilt, I spend countless hours in local gravel pits collecting agates, and my thoughts, trying to understand what had happened. I immersed myself in everything agates and at one point was inspired to write a book about agates by my agate mentor, George Flaim of Duluth, Minnesota. Thanks to George’s prodding I embraced the project and with the input of many people along way, including Charlie and my other UMD professors who reviewed my geological research on the various types, modes of formation, microscopic features, glacial distribution, and history of collecting Lake Superior agates, the book was published in the fall of 1986.
My agate mentor, George Flaim, and I posed for a photo while negotiating a deal in his basement in Duluth, Minnesota, sometime around 1990.
It was a proud and defining moment in my life which helped me move on emotionally from the tragedy with my pride and confidence restored. The following spring, I was invited by the University to give a lecture at UMD about my agate research. Janet joined me for the lecture and afterward my former professors peppered me with technical questions that I answered. After the lecture they invited me to the professor’s lounge where Charlie announced the honorary degree complete with a whipped-cream topped cup of coffee.
The degree was certainly not officially recognized by the University, nor was it ever portrayed to be. It was simply an acknowledgement that my professors were proud of me for fighting through a tough experience, producing something scholarly, while getting my life back on track. I have always portrayed it as an honorary “sympathy” degree. However, it was an honor I was proud of back then and am still proud of today. The misleading blog post put my now elderly retired professors in an awkward position at being questioned about their kind gesture so many years ago. To have this important moment portrayed as somehow dishonest to try and discredit me and my research, only serves as further motivation.
In the future I’m sure we will all look back and recall these “Wild West” days of the Internet. I was prepared for the personal attacks and attempts to marginalize and dismiss my work on the controversial subject matter we investigate on the show and in real life. People like this aren’t really interested in the truth; they are interested in turning the attention onto themselves so they can espouse their own personal “beliefs.” In my view, the worst offender of bias and miss-information on the Internet is Wikipedia. This on-line resource that so many people in the world rely upon simply cannot be trusted; especially when it comes to topics about archaeology and the controversial artifacts I had researched extensively, such as the Kensington Rune Stone, the Tucson Lead Artifacts, and that Bat Creek Stone. They are portrayed as fakes in spite of the obvious and overwhelming factual evidence consistent with authenticity. The world is being manipulated by “Wiki” on these topics and it needs to be stopped.
Shortly after the show premiered, bogus references casting my research in an unfounded negative light began to appear on my Wiki bio page. I tried unsuccessfully to remove it only to have it reappear. Eventually, I demanded they remove the bogus information or delete my bio completely. I’d rather people not have a Wiki bio than to have one sentence in it that was false. An infuriating and condescending week-long debate ensued among the Wiki reviewers and only after threatening legal action did they finally remove my bio completely.
The same situation is currently happening to a brilliant researcher and friend, Charles Pellegrino. Charlie has also had his academic credentials questioned by Internet hackers who have posted false information on his Wiki bio page. Charlie lost his cousin on 9-11 and along with other families who lost loved ones that day has endured harassment and threats by 9-11 “Truthers” whose motives are despicable, and who are openly in charge of his Wikipedia biography. Charlie has also had research on the Titanic and the Talpiot Tomb unjustly criticized by those whose “beliefs” on these subjects are contrary to the factual evidence he and his colleagues have worked hard to document. He has also reached the point of frustration and disgust that he has demanded to have his Wiki bio page removed permanently.
At the end of day, all this banter about scholarly degrees, peer review, academic journals, and fraudulent Wikipedia articles are nothing more than a smokescreen by skeptics and debunkers who offer no meaningful contributions, and try to control and cloud the discussion with misleading and mean-spirited deception and nonsense. The bottom line is the soft-science academic “consensus of opinion” approach to history where there is little to no accountability has failed to find the truth. It’s long past time we put aside the “Myth of Columbus” and defer to the facts. Instead of the court of academic opinion, the factual evidence concerning our history should be considered in a court of law under oath by professionals who understand proper scientific method, ethical practices, and most importantly, accountability.
Saturday, April 12, 2014
Reviewing Peer Review
While waiting for our flight to the other side of the world for our latest Seasons 3 shoot on America Unearthed, I decided to write a blog post about the subject of so many posts: peer review. For years I’ve heard academics complain about peer review of my work on the Kensington Rune Stone and other “taboo” artifacts. They argue and posture hoping they can somehow negate the conclusions I’ve drawn. The fact is all my work has been peer reviewed by some of the most competent, qualified, knowledgeable, objective, and experienced professionals and academics one could want in the hard science disciplines of geology and engineering. The problem skeptical archaeologists, anthropologists, linguists, and historians have is they are trying to assert that the “academic” peer review process is the only acceptable way to truth. Besides trying to frame the argument to their distinct advantage, they couldn’t be more wrong.
Academic peer review in principle works well to a certain degree; if you have the luxury of time and are in an environment immune to the problems commonly seen in academia such as territoriality, competition for funding, runaway egos, intimidation, threats of retribution, favoritism, and ordinary personal pique. In the fourteen years I’ve been involved in the investigation of mysterious artifacts and sites I’ve encountered all of these failings in my dealings with many academics. They insist there is no legitimacy to my or anyone else’s work unless I have gone through the process they dictate is the only acceptable way. Readers of this blog know what I’m talking about.
If this review process is so perfect, then why has it not been able to accurately answer the question of the authenticity of the Kensington Rune Stone, Bat Creek Stone, Spirit Pond Rune Stones, the Newport Tower, and Tucson Lead Artifacts? The fact is academic peer review and publishing process has failed miserably. Further, defenders of the “faith” refuse to look inward and take a critical look of their sacred process to try and figure out what went wrong. Instead, they turn a blind eye to obvious failures, dig their heels in and attack those who dare to question. Allow me to present a particularly egregious example I have been personally involved in that still has reverberations with on-going research.
In 2006, Richard Nielsen and I published our 5-year collaborative work titled, The Kensington Rune Stone: Compelling New Evidence. Nielsen and I became close friends and the collaboration of his runological and linguistic work and my geological work on the artifact produced voluminous new factual data and discoveries that were all consistent with the artifact being a genuine medieval artifact. Shortly after our book was released, financial and personal issues - details of which can be found on the Internet - prompted Nielsen to publically announce that our professional and personal relationship was over. The details of the “breakup” are not important. What is important is the well-documented course of actions Nielsen then chose to pursue.
Nielsen reached out to the academic community in Sweden by admitting he was “bad” for working with the lowly professional geologist and asked forgiveness. Once accepted by one scholar in particular, he then went about things the “academic way” and set his sights on the Runestone Museum. Using the goodwill generated by the previous five years he gained their trust and suggested research that in principal was a good idea. He proposed a digital 3D scan of the artifact using the latest technology. This was performed in November of 2008. In the cleverly worded contract he drafted for the museum, he made himself the sole benefactor of the entire digital data-base. He then refused to provide a copy of that data. To date, that data is still not available to anyone except his sole Swedish academic contact and his then girlfriend/advisor who both apparently believe this is the proper “academic way.”
Now armed with the 3D data base, Nielsen then wrote and published on his own personal website a series of “academic” papers essentially undoing our joint KRS work and bashing me personally. When I eventually read these papers that I assume were “peer reviewed” by his Swedish colleague, it was obvious to me what was going on. Nielsen’s plan was to try to undermine everything I had done and paint himself as the now worthy “academic” and resurrect the KRS in his image. Crazy as it sounds, this story is true. Hardly bitter or angry (well, I was angry when I read the garbage he had written knowing full well he, too, knew it was crap), I feel sorry for my former colleague for the damage he’s done to himself and the Kensington Rune Stone. As of April of 2014, Nielsen still has not released the digital 3D data to the Runestone Museum or any other competent researchers, academic or otherwise.
So what do we take away from this sordid affair? Well, one of the unfortunate events is opportunistic skeptics cite Nielsen’s bogus research as legitimate criticism of my work. I’m sure most don’t realize the “research” they cite is blatantly bias, never had legitimate peer review, and self-published on his own website. Even the writer of a blatantly anti-diffusion page on Wikipedia felt it was appropriate to use Nielsen’s “academic” work to criticize my research on my own Wiki page. Upon deleting the garbage I was chided for editing my own page which incited a debate among the Wiki editors.
After a week of condescending discussion of my demanding that they either delete the fraudulent citations or remove my Wiki page altogether, they removed my page. No doubt they were quite happy to see any mention of the “heretic’s” KRS work go dark. So much for the academic peer review process in this case. For readers interested in an unbiased take on this latest sad chapter in the history of the Kensington Rune Stone, I suggest Darwin Ohman’s, Taking a Stand. Click Here. Darwin takes no pride in writing this article but felt it had to be done.
Let’s get back to peer review. I’m quite sure most academics don’t fully understand what we do in the professional world with regard to peer review which I would argue is just as thorough, faster and, in cases like the Kensington Rune Stone, is more accurate and reliable. The reason I’ve been the principal geologist in over 7,000 forensic projects in almost 30 years is because we have to produce. Academia doesn’t have deadlines and the review process can take years which I don’t believe has produced a better end product.
The other major difference between academic and professional peer review is accountability. As licensed professionals we have taken an oath to perform our work professionally, ethically, and to protect the health and welfare of the public. If licensed professionals are found guilty of incompetent work or unethical practice, we risk losing our license to practice. Further, we are required to testify to our facts, interpretations and conclusions in a court of law under oath. What accountability does a tenured professor have?
When all is said and done, I’m fully prepared to testify and defend my peer-reviewed work on all the artifacts and sites I’ve published results on. I’m really tired of listening to “academic” bloggers and Amazon power-trippers using arrogant posturing and name-calling trying to claim sovereignty over scientific method and the peer review process. Instead, we would all appreciate it if these people would stop trying to dictate what they think is proper scientific method and start practicing it. If you are truly curious about the Kensington Rune Stone and other artifacts and sites, then ask intelligent questions and let’s discuss it like adults. If you don’t “believe” they are genuine, then be happy in your “faith” and take your complaints somewhere else.
Academic peer review in principle works well to a certain degree; if you have the luxury of time and are in an environment immune to the problems commonly seen in academia such as territoriality, competition for funding, runaway egos, intimidation, threats of retribution, favoritism, and ordinary personal pique. In the fourteen years I’ve been involved in the investigation of mysterious artifacts and sites I’ve encountered all of these failings in my dealings with many academics. They insist there is no legitimacy to my or anyone else’s work unless I have gone through the process they dictate is the only acceptable way. Readers of this blog know what I’m talking about.
If this review process is so perfect, then why has it not been able to accurately answer the question of the authenticity of the Kensington Rune Stone, Bat Creek Stone, Spirit Pond Rune Stones, the Newport Tower, and Tucson Lead Artifacts? The fact is academic peer review and publishing process has failed miserably. Further, defenders of the “faith” refuse to look inward and take a critical look of their sacred process to try and figure out what went wrong. Instead, they turn a blind eye to obvious failures, dig their heels in and attack those who dare to question. Allow me to present a particularly egregious example I have been personally involved in that still has reverberations with on-going research.
In 2006, Richard Nielsen and I published our 5-year collaborative work titled, The Kensington Rune Stone: Compelling New Evidence. Nielsen and I became close friends and the collaboration of his runological and linguistic work and my geological work on the artifact produced voluminous new factual data and discoveries that were all consistent with the artifact being a genuine medieval artifact. Shortly after our book was released, financial and personal issues - details of which can be found on the Internet - prompted Nielsen to publically announce that our professional and personal relationship was over. The details of the “breakup” are not important. What is important is the well-documented course of actions Nielsen then chose to pursue.
Nielsen reached out to the academic community in Sweden by admitting he was “bad” for working with the lowly professional geologist and asked forgiveness. Once accepted by one scholar in particular, he then went about things the “academic way” and set his sights on the Runestone Museum. Using the goodwill generated by the previous five years he gained their trust and suggested research that in principal was a good idea. He proposed a digital 3D scan of the artifact using the latest technology. This was performed in November of 2008. In the cleverly worded contract he drafted for the museum, he made himself the sole benefactor of the entire digital data-base. He then refused to provide a copy of that data. To date, that data is still not available to anyone except his sole Swedish academic contact and his then girlfriend/advisor who both apparently believe this is the proper “academic way.”
Now armed with the 3D data base, Nielsen then wrote and published on his own personal website a series of “academic” papers essentially undoing our joint KRS work and bashing me personally. When I eventually read these papers that I assume were “peer reviewed” by his Swedish colleague, it was obvious to me what was going on. Nielsen’s plan was to try to undermine everything I had done and paint himself as the now worthy “academic” and resurrect the KRS in his image. Crazy as it sounds, this story is true. Hardly bitter or angry (well, I was angry when I read the garbage he had written knowing full well he, too, knew it was crap), I feel sorry for my former colleague for the damage he’s done to himself and the Kensington Rune Stone. As of April of 2014, Nielsen still has not released the digital 3D data to the Runestone Museum or any other competent researchers, academic or otherwise.
So what do we take away from this sordid affair? Well, one of the unfortunate events is opportunistic skeptics cite Nielsen’s bogus research as legitimate criticism of my work. I’m sure most don’t realize the “research” they cite is blatantly bias, never had legitimate peer review, and self-published on his own website. Even the writer of a blatantly anti-diffusion page on Wikipedia felt it was appropriate to use Nielsen’s “academic” work to criticize my research on my own Wiki page. Upon deleting the garbage I was chided for editing my own page which incited a debate among the Wiki editors.
![]() |
With Darwin Ohman next to a modern rune stone I carved to commemorate the 2006 book: “Kensington Rune Stone: Compelling New Evidence.” |
Let’s get back to peer review. I’m quite sure most academics don’t fully understand what we do in the professional world with regard to peer review which I would argue is just as thorough, faster and, in cases like the Kensington Rune Stone, is more accurate and reliable. The reason I’ve been the principal geologist in over 7,000 forensic projects in almost 30 years is because we have to produce. Academia doesn’t have deadlines and the review process can take years which I don’t believe has produced a better end product.
The other major difference between academic and professional peer review is accountability. As licensed professionals we have taken an oath to perform our work professionally, ethically, and to protect the health and welfare of the public. If licensed professionals are found guilty of incompetent work or unethical practice, we risk losing our license to practice. Further, we are required to testify to our facts, interpretations and conclusions in a court of law under oath. What accountability does a tenured professor have?
When all is said and done, I’m fully prepared to testify and defend my peer-reviewed work on all the artifacts and sites I’ve published results on. I’m really tired of listening to “academic” bloggers and Amazon power-trippers using arrogant posturing and name-calling trying to claim sovereignty over scientific method and the peer review process. Instead, we would all appreciate it if these people would stop trying to dictate what they think is proper scientific method and start practicing it. If you are truly curious about the Kensington Rune Stone and other artifacts and sites, then ask intelligent questions and let’s discuss it like adults. If you don’t “believe” they are genuine, then be happy in your “faith” and take your complaints somewhere else.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)