Wednesday, June 19, 2019

America Unearthed, Season 4, Episode 4, "Jack the Ripper"


This episode was really interesting to make as I never knew the intricate details of the case beforehand.  This probably helped as I had no preconceived notions about the case and truly went in with a wide-open mind.  The perspective of the Friedman’s was eye-opening to say the least, and as they described the wounds of the victims two things quickly became apparent; first, there was a clear connection to one aspect of Freemasonry, and second, this aspect was something I have taken vows not to discuss with anyone other than a brother Mason.  Talk about being torn!  On one hand, here was clear and distinct evidence the Ripper had highly secret knowledge known only to Master Masons (even today details about this aspect are scant on the Internet).  On the other hand, this important evidence I was not allowed to discuss!  What I was able to say was, if true, this evidence could only have been known to a Freemason.  Most importantly, our very famous suspect, Arthur Conan Doyle was a Freemason with an interesting Masonic resume.  I found it very curious, and suspicious, that he was raised as a Master Mason in 1887, the Ripper murders happened in 1888, and in 1889 Doyle dropped out of Freemasonry and we have not been able to find out why.  While not conclusive evidence Doyle committed the murders, these facts were a huge red flag for me.

Of course, additional evidence began to fall into place as the episode unfolded painting a damming picture of our suspect.  While doubtful we would have secured a conviction at trial that Doyle was indeed Jack the Ripper, but in many ways, he was the perfect suspect leaving many lingering questions about this deeply complicated man.


Daniel Friedman, and his father, Gene Friedman, pose for a photo in Gene's home on Long Island, New York, after shooting a great scene for the "Ripper" episode.


While the Committee Films crew prepares to shoot a scene at the Newberry Library in Chicago, Illinois, Physician Daniel Friedman, poses for a photo with Arthur Conan Doyle’s Master Mason apron, and Masonic code book, along with first edition copies of Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes writings.  


Ripper expert and guest, Andrew Gough (center) and the Committee Films crew waits while a “Jack the Ripper” tour group moves on.  This is the location where the last ripper victim, Katheryn Eddowes, was brutally killed and disemboweled on September 30, 1888.  


On the street directly across from the Grand Lodge of England are several granite curb stones with interesting carvings.  This particular stone, with two "X" symbols with dots in the four quadrants, is an identical prototype to the Masonic Knights Templar cipher code.


British Masonic scholar, David Harrison, and I pose for a selfie in front of the residence where Arthur Conan Doyle lived in London when he wrote some of his Sherlock Holmes mysteries. 


I paused for a photo in the middle of my dissection of a silicone cadaver containing the internal organs of a pig that are nearly identical to humans. 


The front side of the original "Dear Boss" letter received by London police on September 27, 1888.


The back side of the original "Dear Boss" letter where it is signed by "Jack the Ripper", which was the origin of the infamous name of the killer. 


Shepard Girl submitted artwork for this episode and I though it was something worth sharing.







55 comments:

  1. Really enjoying the new episodes, keep em coming!

    Also, I've tried contacting you via email recently, but I'm not sure I'm getting through. Do you have a preferred method of contact regarding new information you might find interesting?

    Thanks in advance for your reply!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nate,

      I still have literally hundreds of emails to go through yet, but I will get to them.

      Delete
    2. I enjoyed the Jack The Ripper episode as Jack The Ripper is one of my favorite murder mysteries. I just wanted to say that I don't believe that Arthur Conan Doyle is the murder suspect. There is another suspect that was mentioned on a facebook page and his name is Charles A. Lechmere. https://www.jack-the-ripper.org/charles-cross.htm

      Delete
  2. Hello Scott,

    Your show is called "America Unearthed". Unless, one considers the American suspect, Tumblety...I don't see what this has to do with America.
    A Geologist dissecting a silicone cadaver...That is more disturbing than educational. This seems so far off narrative like, your Bigfoot episode. Not sure of the Travel Channel's angle on this one. This is a critique of your producers, and not, yourself.

    Anthony Warren

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony,

      First, you might remember we did visit examine and test ACD's Masonic apron in Chicago which is the tie to America. Having said that, the network is open to my performing investigations outside the U.S. and I'm fine with that.

      The dissection scene had a scientific purpose and made for good television for some, but admittedly not all. I enjoyed the scene and found it relevant. Sorry you didn't enjoy it.

      I'm not above criticism and appreciate your comments. I think you'll this week's episode as it' more in line with our narrative.

      Delete
    2. Scott, I thought it was great. It made it easier to "see" her guts up over her shoulder. It didn't make sense before. I liked the episode, but I do find Jack the Ripper fascinating. I just wish I had something for you to investigate so I could meet you, but I don't. Keep the episodes coming.

      Delete
    3. Brenda,

      Maybe we'll meet at a lecture sometime and you'll have something interesting to investigate.

      Delete
  3. Another really good episode. I did wonder if there was some interesting info/evidence that didn't make the show. Still, I thought it was fascinating.

    As I mentioned on Twitter, I am not 100% convinced that ACD was Jack the Ripper. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that does point his direction. So I think it's certainly plausible. But I still didn't see anything that screams, "Yes, he's the one!"

    But I really liked your Freemason evidence. That's something I had not heard before. And that certainly was compelling. So I think the killer had to be a Freemason, or one that had advanced enough in Freemasonry to have acquired that knowledge. It would be interesting to look aback at the suspects list and see which of them could have been or have been proven to been Freemasons.

    Great show once again!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe C.

      You are right that a lot of really good evidence related to Doyle did not make the show since we learned about it too late to include it. Not a conclusive case for him, but very compelling IMHO.

      Delete
    2. I might add this link from a decade ago that makes a compelling argument for Doyle being the Ripper: https://probaway.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/jack-the-ripper-was-arthur-conan-doyle/

      Delete
    3. Very cool...will definitely check that link out.

      Well, hopefully somewhere down the line some of that new evidence will be made public. It would be nice as well to have updates on past shows as new evidence and/or findings come in. As an aside, do you get much grief from your fellow Masonic brethren about revealing some of those Masonic secrets?

      I am just glad to have America Unearthed back on my TV screen again. It's pretty much like you never left. Look forward to viewing it every time it is on.

      Delete
    4. Joe C.

      I didn't reveal any secrets I'm supposed to keep secret. In fact, my Masonic brethren are pleased we're bringing Freemasonry to the forefront and helping people better understand what we are about. I take my Masonic vows very seriously and consulted with the Grand Lodge of Minnesota during filming of this episode to make sure we didn't venture into questionable territory.

      Delete
  4. Glad you're back for a new season. I was wondering when you would get around to petitioning a lodge.

    Mike

    AF&AM Tolerance #1165 Beaumont, Texas

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bro Mike,

      I am so taken and accepted by brethren and fellows...

      Delete
  5. I enjoyed it but, after watching American Ripper, for me the evidence that the Ripper was H. H. Holmes was much more convincing. I will admit I was not convinced that Mary Kelly was a copy cat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stark, the MO of Henry Mudget (HHHolmes) is completely different from Jack’s. What motivated Holmes to carry out his evil deeds was financial gain— not revenge! His methods ran the gamut from locking his victims in airtight vaults, poisoning them with gas, and subjecting them to torture. Holmes, unlike the Ripper, derived special enjoyment from hearing the screams of his victims, and only after they died did he dissect them and sell their body parts to medical schools ala Burke and share. Holmes lured his victims to HIS CASTLE with what appeared to be seemingly legitimate employment advertisements in local newspapers. He took out life insurance policies on some of his victims and named himself the sole beneficiary. This all runs counter to the Ripper! To learn more, I refer you to my book The Strange Case of Dr. Doyle.

      Delete
    2. The MO of Henry Mudget (H.H. Holmes) is completely different from Jack’s. What motivated Holmes to carry out his evil deeds was financial gain— not revenge! His methods ran the gamut from locking his victims in airtight vaults, poisoning them with gas, and subjecting them to torture. Holmes, unlike the Ripper, derived special enjoyment from hearing the screams of his victims, and only after they died did he dissect them and sell their body parts to medical schools ala Burke and share. Holmes lured his victims to HIS CASTLE with what appeared to be seemingly legitimate employment advertisements in local newspapers. He took out life insurance policies on some of his victims and named himself the sole beneficiary. This all runs counter to the Ripper! To learn more, I refer you to my book The Strange Case of Dr. Doyle.

      Delete
    3. Dan,

      These are interesting details I've not heard before. What is the time frame for the murders Holmes committed? How close do they coincide with the Ripper murders?

      Delete
    4. Agreed on hhholmes after what I just read bout him and Doyle I'd go for Dr. Henry Howard Holmes he confessed to 27 murders only 9 were confirmed

      Delete
  6. "clear and distinct evidence the Ripper had highly secret knowledge known only to Master Masons" Or anyone who could buy a book or get a Freemason drunk. I seem to remember you moved through every possible initiation in about a year.

    On another note, I've gone back and read every comment on this site, oldest to newest. What's the deal with this Anthony Warren guy? "Zealots" stole his email account? You are very patient.

    - VM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Val,

      "Buy a book or get a Freemason drunk" is a little too flippant a statement about something you know nothing about.

      Anthony is a passionate guy and like all of us, you and I included, sometimes gets a little spun up on the keyboard. I try to be patient with everyone unless they don't deserve.

      Delete
    2. Scott,

      As one brother to another, don't be so flippant as to deliver judgments on someone you don't know. I am indeed a Mason.

      You don't get your email account yanked or more likely imagine that happened because you're "passionate". That's more toward the crazy part of the spectrum.

      I have noticed your increased tolerance over the last few months and I applaud it.

      - VM (Vir Magnificus)

      Delete
    3. Bro Val,

      I find your comments even more surprising coming from a Mason, but perhaps it was meant tongue in cheek. I have never found myself willing to share passwords, handshakes or penal signs with anyone no matter how many drinks I've had.

      As for Anthony, as long as he or anyone else conducts themselves appropriately here they can continue to post. As you know, troll behavior is "one and done."

      Tolerance is something I always try to work on, but sometimes I know I can do better.

      Delete
    4. Scott,

      Because I am eclectic even to the point of being apoplectic, I follow The Prophet's dictum of "Seek ye knowledge, even unto China." Having met a blond haired Mason from Afghanistan (early 1980s) i've learned not to judge so much.

      --VM

      Delete
  7. I enjoyed the episode, as I have all.of them, but I am still convinced the Ripper was H. H. Holmes, after watching Ametican Ripper. I also do not agree with Mary Kelly's murder being a copy cat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. StarkTarayen,

      Many people agree with you and you could be right. However, I think Doyle is just as good a suspect. The more you learn about him the creepier he gets.

      Delete
  8. It was talked about that Jack the Ripper coming to the USA if that is true would you still believe Arthur Conan Double would be Jack the Ripper?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Happy Knitter,

      Talk isn't evidence. However, if the Ripper was proven to have moved to the US that would be problematic for Doyle being the suspect. However, there is no factual evidence to support the premise, and how could there be since we still don't know who he was?

      Delete
    2. I was curious about your thoughts on it I would like to think after the white chapel murders jtr had a massive coronary it was a cowardly act by an idiot I am trying to be polite what was done to women trying to survive sickens me.
      TonyaWabashSt

      Delete
    3. Happy Knitter,

      If the Ripper was Doyle, he lived many more years with the secret kept only to him. If it wasn't him; I like to think he got what he had coming to him, but until he is identified I guess we'll never know.

      Delete
  9. I enjoyed learning a bit more about Freemasons than I knew and I really appreciated you sending the difference between Stone Mason and Freemason as I always thought the two were one. Certainly sparked my interest enough to research the two for my own knowledge base. Still can’t agree on the Doyle theory though. One thing, I didn’t understand why the markings in the cobbles along the road leading the Mason lodge was relevant to the possibility of Doyle being the Ripper. Your Producers May have left some crucial info in the cutting room floor there, not sure. It was fascinating for sure but relevance? I will say that I do prefer the investigations that are based more in geology than the speculative ones but then again, I enjoy revisiting intriguing and perplexing mysteries that have plagued our history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Careylynn,

      I think Doyle is a strong suspect, but admittedly, there are others. I quite agree the mason's marks on the curbstone had nothing to do with Doyle and the Ripper. I voiced my opinion in that regard, but it was used anyway.

      It was a fun episode to do, but you'll see more of what you typically see from me in the coming episodes. The best is yet to come.

      Delete
  10. I have saved your blog on my bookmark tab so I can get to it any time I want to. My grandfather was a Freemason in Mississippi.

    I don't think Doyle was the ripper. I'm more inclined to go with HH Holmes. Do you know if he was a Freemason or not? I think Holmes is a far better candidate than Doyle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brenda,

      I think Holmes was indeed a Freemason; he's a very strong suspect as well.

      Delete
    2. Brenda, the MO of Henry Mudget (HHHolmes) is completely different from Jack’s. What motivated Holmes to carry out his evil deeds was financial gain— not revenge! His methods ran the gamut from locking his victims in airtight vaults, poisoning them with gas, and subjecting them to torture. Holmes, unlike the Ripper, derived special enjoyment from hearing the screams of his victims, and only after they died did he dissect them and sell their body parts to medical schools ala Burke and share. Holmes lured his victims to HIS CASTLE with what appeared to be seemingly legitimate employment advertisements in local newspapers. He took out life insurance policies on some of his victims and named himself the sole beneficiary. This all runs counter to the Ripper! To learn more, I refer you to my book The Strange Case of Dr. Doyle.

      Delete
  11. Doyle...very interesting. My personal thought is that Doyle disliked academia and that's why he wrote license to kill on that picture after graduation from medical school. He knew the history of bloodletting and mercury poisoning by the medical establishment was quackery. Also, the fact that he was uncomfortable killing seals proves that this was a good man. Doyle was a man that abandoned the religious beliefs of his parents to seek higher truth. I would need some hard evidence on his belief about women and prostitutes for this theory. We know that he cared deeply for his mother and worked very hard to keep his wife alive after the tuberculosis dx. No, no and no way. A fabulous show, but a charismatic Doyle was destined for success long before the ripper. Take care, amigo...looking forward to episode 5

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony,

      I realize we probably didn't make a conclusive case, but a compelling case for sure. An interesting character for sure.

      Delete
    2. The Ripper case will always captivate an audience. I recall a possible link to a Dr with the royal family. Tough case...but very interesting indeed.

      Delete
  12. Hi,Scott, love your show. I just watched your Jack the Ripper episode. The last victim had her nose and ear cut off. Did Doyle's father lose his nose and ear in the last stages of syphilis? If so, this could be why she got her's cut off, and why she was the last victim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown,

      I have never heard anything like that happening to Doyle's father. Maybe Dan Friedman wants to chime in about that?

      Delete
    2. Thank you Scott Wolter and Dan Friedman for answering my question, I appreciate it.

      Delete
  13. Although Doyle’s father’s ears and nose went to the grave with him, In The Adventure of the Cardboard Box, Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Watson, and Scotland Yard’s Detective Inspector Lestrade examine two severed human ears which had been posted to a resident of Croydon. Holmes states unequivocally that ears are so unique in their structure, that investigators can determine the gender and certain hereditary traits of their owner. By scrupulously studying the victim’s ears, Holmes discovers that the ears in the box are from two separate people and that a double murder had been committed. The Ripper, in one of his letters, confesses that he was about to forward one of his victim’s ears to a Vigilance committee, but instead, decided to send in a portion of the victim’s kidney in a cardboard box to a pathologist. That victim was killed on the night when Jack committed his double murders. Even more interesting is the strange coincidence that The Adventure of the Cardboard Box takes place on exactly the one year anniversary of Jack’s initial venture into Whitechapel!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fact of the matter is that Doyle's father, despite being in institutions and under the care of multiple doctors for many years and his own son being a doctor was never diagnosed as having syphilis.
      This entire case is dependent on baseless speculation.

      http://www.rcpe.ac.uk/sites/default/files/u_beveridge2.pdf

      Delete
  14. https://books.google.com/books?id=KLZXAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA710&dq=Doyle+contagious+diseases+act+portsmouth+gazette&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi9oIaMtP_iAhWLjlkKHfrLBzwQ6AEIPTAE#v=onepage&q=Doyle%20contagious%20diseases%20act%20portsmouth%20gazette&f=false
    This should help! Now where did you hear that Doyle had compassion for the seals? I refer you, not to my book, but to doyle’s journal, Dangerous Work. It will certainly change your mind. (Dangerous Work:Diary of an Arctic Adventure. Edited by Jon Lellenberg and Daniel Stashower).
    For more information, I refer you to my book, The Strange Case of Dr. Doyle, chapter 11 in the paperback edition.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Whether or not Charles Doyle was a victim of syphilis is not the issue here. What is relevant is that his father had an absent knee jerk reflex (Westphal’s sign) upon admission to Montrose and that Conan Doyle knew it to be pathognomic of syphilis. In fact, he placed emphasis on this absent knee jerk reflex (westphal’s sign) in his MD thesis. Conan Doyle further emphasized one of syphilis’s early signs —-neuralgia,—- an affliction which had plagued him intermittently starting in his earliest teenage years. Conan Doyle began self-medicating with concoctions often used for the treatment of syphilis (pyrogallic acid, murrell’s solution, etc). Remember, in the 1880s, syphilis was thought to be transmissible from father to son over the course of several generations— Lamarckism theory—- and a concept Doyle so poignantly wrote about in his short story, The Third Generation. I appreciate your interest and I refer you to my book, the paperback edition of The Strange Case of Dr. Doyle (pages 265-270)
    As I write this, I’m reminded of my days as a young medical student, when I suffered from medical student syndrome— the belief that any sign or symptom I read about or experienced was associated with a devastating illness that might bring about my early demise. Kind of like Three Men in a Boat by Jerome K Jerome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Whether or not Charles Doyle was a victim of syphilis is not the issue here."

      I beg to disagree, it is the crux of your argument for motivation.

      The fact is that his father was diagnosed with severe alcoholism of which a symptom is indeed an absent knee jerk reflex and he WAS NOT diagnosed with syphilis.

      Again I say any talk of his father having syphilis is nothing more than speculation.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK396/

      "Peripheral neuropathy is today the most common cause of absent reflexes. The causes include diseases such as diabetes, alcoholism, amyloidosis, uremia; vitamin deficiencies such as pellagra, beriberi, pernicious anemia; remote cancer; toxins including lead, arsenic, isoniazid, vincristine, diphenylhydantoin."

      Delete
    2. Syphilis is indeed transmissible from father to son, via the mother, leaving aside other, more untoward avenues. Not rocket science, and commonly taught in medical school.

      -- VM (Vir Magnificus)

      Delete
  16. Doyle was a writer and doctor he died of a heart attack in the year 1930 at age 71 I would go more for herman webster mudgett also known as Dr Henry Howard Holmes

    ReplyDelete
  17. Val, although we know today that a man can infect a woman with syphilis who then gives birth to a child with syphilis, back in the 19th century, it was widely accepted by the medical community that a man could DIRECTLY infect the fetus with syphilis via sperm WITHOUT the mother becoming infected. We must keep 19th century medical theory in mind when we discuss Doyle and Jack the Ripper.

    ReplyDelete
  18. People had a wrong idea about something that actually happened?

    So what?

    This has nothing to do with Lamarckianism.

    Best Regards,

    VM (Vir Magnificus)

    ReplyDelete
  19. I watched a show not long ago about America's first serial killer. Several experts thought it was Jack the ripper and that he had came to the U.S. and continued his murder here. Any thoughts on this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jim,

      That would be H. Holmes whom a lot of people like a being the Ripper. However, there are issues with him being the suspect as well that Dan knows a lot more about and may want to comment on.

      Delete
    2. I’m sorry if I disrespect anyone on this comment..... but have done sooo much research on this... yes!!!! H.H.Holmes was in fact the Ripper! There are boat manifests to London aliases that have been authenticated during the ripper years and during that time there were no murders in the US.... there are coincidences..... but then there are coincidences that are too coincidental .... js

      Delete
    3. Key and all,

      The truth we don't know who the Ripper was and likely never will. But I understand what it's like to become convinced by a a certain person. DNA would have solved this case quickly; if only...

      Delete
  20. The Ripper was a well-to-do man. He spoke French (as did Doyle). Here is a chilling play-by-play of the Ripper in action. Not for the faint of heart. Chilling.

    The Farsight Institute on the Ripper.

    https://youtu.be/eHhpY7FDBqE

    ReplyDelete