Wednesday, July 24, 2019

America Unearthed, Season 4, Episode 9, Who Was the Haymarket Bomber?

The Haymarket Affair was a story I have to confess to never having heard about prior to the start of filming the episode.  It didn't take long to get up to speed after reading numerous articles about the the history of the late 19th Century labor movement, the protests, and the events leading up to that fateful night in Chicago on May 4, 1886, when a bomb was thrown into a crowd of law enforcement officers and protesters by someone who has remained nameless; until now.  Going into the investigation, the production company researchers at Committee Films, Will Yates and Kyle Schultz, settled on a suspect prior to filming that seemed perfectly plausible.  There was new evidence in the form of newly discovered letters written by a family descendant that seemed to support that our  mysterious Haymarket bomber suspect was George Meng.

However, things changed dramatically as we began filming with various experts, historians, and members of law enforcement.  There was one person in particular, Richard Linderg, who had the most impressive argument and facts about the bombing that pointed to the most likely person was who threw the bomb that night.  His evidence and reasoning was so persuasive that I believed we had to rethink our original suspect.  By the time the interview with Mr. Lindberg was over my mind had changed.  He had convinced me the person who threw the bomb that night was a German immigrant named Rudolf Schnaubelt.  The final nail that I believe proved the new suspect was indeed the person who threw the bomb at Haymarket Square was the suspect sketch drawn by officer Detector Luis Santoyo.  The face he drew based on the witness testimony from the trial over 130 years earlier was a spot-on match to Schnaubelt.  

What I was most proud of in this episode if that we used proper scientific method, and based on the evidence and facts, it led to a different conclusion than originally anticipated.  That is the way it is scientific investigation is supposed to work.          


The Committee Films crew poses with Bleue Benton, at the Martyr's Monument in the Forest Home Cemetery in Forest Park, Illinois.


This bronze statue erected in honor of the law enforcement officers that died during the Haymarket riot was originally placed at the Haymarket site.  Vandalism by supporters of the labor party prompted the statue to be moved to a different location in Chicago.  Looks like the artist who made the statue was a member of a certain order.  Do you know why I say that? 


Field producer, Will Yates, photo-bombed (pardon the pun) this selfie taken with Pinkerton agents, Erika Koutrakis and Tim Williams.


Haymarket historian, Richard Lindberg, poses for a photo after his sharing his historical evidence that compelled me to change the original suspect I focused on to Rudolf Schnaubelt.  This is how proper scientific method works; new evidence often takes an investigation in a new direction. 


Cook Country Sheriff's Office sketch artist, Detector Luis Santoyo, draws the face of the Haymarket bomber based on witness testimony descriptions at the time of the trial.


The picture of Rudolf Schnabelt and the artist's sketch of the Haymarket bomber made from first-hand witnesses testimony from trial transcripts from the late 1880s.


Local law enforcement and federal demolitions experts posed with me and the Committee Films Crew during filming of the test explosions at Camp Ripley in Central Minnesota.


Panoramic photo of the setup of mannequins for the test explosion of the Haymarket bomb at a demolition site on the grounds at Camp Ripley in Central Minnesota. 


This female mannequin sustained a fatal shrapnel wound through the heart during our test explosion of a replica I made of the Haymarket bomb.   


The world's foremost expert on explosives, Dr. Kirk Yeager, and I pose for a pic during the filming of the lab scene where he explained the details of our test explosion of  a replica of the Haymarket bomb.

16 comments:

  1. I really enjoy the science behind your investigations and the honesty. It is t very often you will see someone change their opinion once their mind is made up regardless of the evidence. Thank you for your integrity in these matters. It makes watching your show a very educational experience. I do hope they are available to show my granddaughter when she is old enough to understand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CareyLynn,

      It was very gratifying to have the facts directly impact the final conclusion. It was especially important we got it right because we are implicating an individual whose legacy is going to be impacted. In this case, I believe we got it right.

      Delete
  2. Another episode where I learned something new. Living here in IL, I had heard about the Haymarket bombing incident. But didn't know all the circumstances behind it. Or that it remained unsolved to this day.

    I really enjoyed the episode for 2 reasons. One, it was so cool how you managed to get such cooperation from the FBI explosives experts to conduct that blast experiment. That was fascinating to watch.

    Also at the end seeing that composite drawing so closely resemble Mr. Schnaubelt. It was almost like going back in time. Great work by that artist and by you piecing all the eyewitness descriptions together like that.

    Makes you wonder though what else is buried in that time capsule. Would be nice if finally all of it comes to light some day.

    Lastly like you mention during the show, a great debt of gratitude is owed to all those workers who literally gave their lives for some of the benefits we take for granted today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe C,

      Initially we were going to try to get that time capsule from underneath the Martyr's Monument, but it turned out to be untenable given all the challenges. However, when one door closes, another usually opens and in this case it was a much better door!

      Working with the FBI was amazing and boy were they helpful. Making, throwing and then blowing up the bomb brought the whole incident to life for me and helped me understand and appreciate what happens to a body when shrapnel goes through it. Richard Lindberg was extremely helpful and persuasive with his facts and interpretations about Schnaubelt and of course, Detective Santoyo's sketch sealed the deal.

      I'm glad you enjoyed the episode and you are right on the money realizing how important the sacrifice of those workers was back then to insure the fair and humane conditions in the workplace we all enjoy today. Good stuff!

      Delete
  3. You have changed History and T.V. i appreciate all that you do. Keep moving forward!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown,

      I'm really proud of the work we did in this episode and thank you for the kind words. I truly believe we got it right.

      Delete
  4. Great show! So nice to have the show back on television.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Scott, really liked the Chicago Haymarket Square episode. Well done on the research and I believe you're conclusions were as near truth as one could get sans a confession.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CanaryvilleKid,

      Glad you enjoyed the episode as I did too. I also think we go the identity of the bomber right and it should go down in history as now solved. Thanks for sending the note.

      Delete
  6. Scott, your conclusion on the Chicago Haymarket Square episode appears to be spot on. Well done on doing such indepth research in this. However, the "dummie test"... so many more people should have died according to your test and perhaps that bomb was more "baseball" in size to be thrown 80 feet? Loyal fan from Hennepin Cty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CanaryvilleKid,

      Actually, local law enforcement recovered some of the bombs that were made but never thrown. We replicated them exactly to size. It wasn't much bigger than a baseball, but it was still pretty heavy being made of lead.

      Delete
  7. Hello Mr. Wolter,
    First, I want to thank you for the huge contribution to our understanding of our history. I am wondering if you have examined the Sauk stone in MN and if you feel it has any connection to the Kensington Runestone. Also, I am wondering if you think that the discovery spot for the Kensington Runestone is accurate. On page 44 of your book, "The Hooked X", the picture would seem to indicate that it is not, or that there is something important at a different spot.
    If you have not examined the Sauk stone I would be happy to set this up for you.
    Diane Pagel

    ReplyDelete
  8. Diane,

    Are you talking about the the huge glacial erratic boulders with stone holes called an "Altar Stone?" If so, yes I have examined it and whether it is connected to the KRS in some way is unclear.

    As far as the actually KRS discovery site, where the monument is in the park is NOT the correct location. The intersection of the three lines drawn aligning with stone holes is where the artifact was actually discovered. This is confirmed by the topographic features in the historical photos that place the discovery site in a slight draw in the southeast part of the eastern most 40 acre plot on the Ohman Farm.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Scott hello I have a relic that has your hooked x plus the chevron and the cross i researched it so far and have found it came from Germany around 1300AD Im thinking you might want to see this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Theresa,

      Sounds interesting and from the correct time period. Best way to contact me to share photos is via email: swolter@amengtest.com

      Delete